Breaking News
Power DesignLine Blog

Don't diss the LDO

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Don't diss the LDO
Duane Benson   7/14/2010 11:35:14 PM
NO RATINGS
There are still plenty of applications that are just fine with a three-terminal LDO. Even plenty that do well with a non-LDO 78XX series regulator. Sure there are tight tolerance applications that need something newer and more efficient, but it's hard to find something easier to implement than a little three-terminal linear regulator. It may not have the cachet, but it's quick to design in and, in the right place, will just work solidly.

green_is_now
User Rank
CEO
re: Don't diss the LDO
green_is_now   7/9/2010 10:35:57 PM
NO RATINGS
It can be just as efficient as a multistage SMPS if a 1st stage smps is creating a voltage just above the LDO limit. If small currents then 2nd dc2dc switching and conduction losses elimination may cover LDO losses for small loads. If 1st stage is a output needed for another rail even better.

kendallcp
User Rank
Rookie
re: Don't diss the LDO
kendallcp   7/4/2010 12:42:01 PM
NO RATINGS
When you pick a regulator vendor, consider the support they provide for simulation. Many people agonize about finding the best simulation models for their op-amps, but few people actually model what's happening on their supply rails, if they are using linear regulators. Not all three-terminal regulators are the same, either in the noise that they spit out or in the way they respond to variations in current demand!

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week