Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Power DesignLine Blog

Don't diss the LDO

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Don't diss the LDO
Duane Benson   7/14/2010 11:35:14 PM
NO RATINGS
There are still plenty of applications that are just fine with a three-terminal LDO. Even plenty that do well with a non-LDO 78XX series regulator. Sure there are tight tolerance applications that need something newer and more efficient, but it's hard to find something easier to implement than a little three-terminal linear regulator. It may not have the cachet, but it's quick to design in and, in the right place, will just work solidly.

green_is_now
User Rank
CEO
re: Don't diss the LDO
green_is_now   7/9/2010 10:35:57 PM
NO RATINGS
It can be just as efficient as a multistage SMPS if a 1st stage smps is creating a voltage just above the LDO limit. If small currents then 2nd dc2dc switching and conduction losses elimination may cover LDO losses for small loads. If 1st stage is a output needed for another rail even better.

kendallcp
User Rank
Rookie
re: Don't diss the LDO
kendallcp   7/4/2010 12:42:01 PM
NO RATINGS
When you pick a regulator vendor, consider the support they provide for simulation. Many people agonize about finding the best simulation models for their op-amps, but few people actually model what's happening on their supply rails, if they are using linear regulators. Not all three-terminal regulators are the same, either in the noise that they spit out or in the way they respond to variations in current demand!

December 2014 Cartoon Caption Contest: White Smoke Is Rising!
December 2014 Cartoon Caption Contest: White Smoke Is Rising!
"Remember when someone promised us change a few years ago? That's all we have left!"
2 comments
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week