Breaking News
RF & Microwave Designline Blog

Home networking battle continues: one person's view

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
SoCalTechGuy
User Rank
Rookie
re: Home networking battle continues: one person's view
SoCalTechGuy   7/1/2009 5:12:53 PM
NO RATINGS
It is truly amazing what the power-line communications guys have been able to achieve. However... I'm with you in that power-line is a ugly channel and difficult to often time impossible to send any appreciable amount of data consistently and we are not even talking about maintaining any Quality-of-Service (QoS). We have tested many of the Power solutions out there claiming to be 200 Mbps, 400 Mbps at found most of them to average in the tens of Megabits not hundreds. Now don't get me wrong even tens of Mbps is pretty impressive given the channel. But it is clearly not hundreds of Mbps. I now hear of one company "Claiming" Giga bit data rates on powerline. That's an interesting number given that from an FCC regulatory limit Powerline communications is limited to 30 MHz and less. That would translate to better than 33 bits per Hz!!! what modulation are they using for that? QAM-4,000,000,000 anyone? Sounds like their Marketing department wrote the specifications and not Engineering.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.