Breaking News
Break Points

Fifty Years of TTL

NO RATINGS
1 saves
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
Re: SN7400N in stock at Digi-Key
Duane Benson   6/27/2014 2:44:27 AM
NO RATINGS
I still have a few 7400 series chips that I bought in the late 70's or early 80's in my parts bins

John Birkner
User Rank
Rookie
Re: The Soul of A New Machine
John Birkner   6/27/2014 1:57:31 AM
NO RATINGS
I remember that it was Data General using PALs in the MV8000 to replace TTL.

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
Re: The Soul of A New Machine
Kevin Neilson   6/27/2014 1:37:31 AM
NO RATINGS
"Ah, the memories," says Doug.  Pun intended?

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
Re: Unequal output source/sink
Kevin Neilson   6/27/2014 1:36:24 AM
NO RATINGS
A lot of engineers still use active-low signals in HDL, which drives me nuts.  It just adds confusion, and isn't really helpful unless you accidently time-warp back to 1982.  Then when they OR them together they'll DeMorganize which makes everything more confusing:

if ~(rst_a & rst_b & rst_c) ...

Homer J Simpson
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Unequal output source/sink
Homer J Simpson   6/27/2014 1:27:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Those would be Schottky diodes, not zeners. Probably the Low-power Schottky 74LS series TTL - my personal favorite because that's what I grew up with. Oh boy, where did the last 30 years go?!

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
Re: SN7400N in stock at Digi-Key
David Ashton   6/26/2014 9:56:37 PM
NO RATINGS
You still see 7406s - hex inverters - used as drivers.  Open collector with Vce = 30V and Isink = 40 MA.  But most people now would use the ULN2003 or similar.  Even better specs.

traneus
User Rank
Rookie
SN7400N in stock at Digi-Key
traneus   6/26/2014 9:26:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Digi-Key does stock Texas Instruments SN7400N quad NAND gates (p/n 296-14641-5-ND, $1.64 for one piece) and a few other parts in the original series.

DougInRB
User Rank
Manager
Re: The Soul of A New Machine
DougInRB   6/26/2014 4:23:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Ahhh the memories....  That was required reading in one of my EE classes at Cal Poly (mid '80s)  I had never dreamed there would be so much intrigue and espionage in the design of a computer.  I recall that GI was one of the first to utilize PALs.

 

TanjB
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Unequal output source/sink
TanjB   6/26/2014 11:59:24 AM
NO RATINGS
I believe the origin of the asymmetry traces back to relay logic.  Relays were either on or off (subtly different from high or low) and that conditioned the way of thinking about logic.  It suited bipolar transistors very well, especially since they could only make NPN on the chip in the early days (to do both would add process steps).  Well, they could have made a chip with all PNP but that performed worse then as they still do today, so TTL was all NPN and engineers could happily continue in the mindset of a "1" being switch on, pull down.  There was not much concern about capacitance so pull-up current could be low.  External wires themselves became extra logic (a bus line served as a "wired NAND" when it had a pull-up resistor).

CMOS was exotic technology requiring the chip to go through extra process steps.  The first forms which came out in the early 70s were aimed at low power and almost seemed like magic (they ran on less than a micro-amp!).  But even these, initially, had the same asymmetric ability to sink 20mA (a standard which went back to teletypes and relays) with very little pull-up (which was fortunate since the PMOS transistors, like PNP, were lower performance than NMOS).  It was not until the late 80s when CMOS was pervasive and wired-NAND style busses finally died in pursuit of higher frequency / lower power operation that CMOS outputs became routinely symmetric and the idea of pull down faded entirely.

I'm pretty sure that version with zener diodes must have been a very late iteration of TTL.  I recall zeners being a novelty in the early 70s as discretes, and it probably added complexity for them to learn to make them on the same chip as the transistors.

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Unequal output source/sink
zeeglen   6/26/2014 11:51:05 AM
NO RATINGS
FINALLY an explanation of why active-low switches and LEDs were preferred.

Can still remember my first time with CMOS and how it was so nice to have the choice of LED drive.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll