Breaking News
Power Tips

Power Tip 56: Estimate PWB interconnect inductance

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Stuart.Currie
User Rank
Rookie
re: Power Tip 56: Estimate PWB interconnect inductance
Stuart.Currie   2/21/2013 8:09:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Good Article. I think I caught a typo. height and width metric dimensions in Table 2 are likely in (mm) not (cm).

gootee
User Rank
Rookie
re: Power Tip 56: Estimate PWB interconnect inductance
gootee   3/1/2013 3:03:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, the units for the left half of table 2 (and in the accompanying equation) should be mm, not cm, and the inductances/mm in the third column should be divided by 10. OR, the numbers in the first two columns could be divided by 10.

Plasman
User Rank
Rookie
re: Power Tip 56: Estimate PWB interconnect inductance
Plasman   4/4/2013 7:59:29 PM
NO RATINGS
The first part this article is impracticle and misleading. The dominate factor of trace inductance is loop area and not length. Two 5 inch traces (drive and return) routed 1 inch apart would have much more inductance than the same traces routed 0.01 inches apart on a single layer board. The reason that adding the ground plane helps is that the effective area is reduces since the distance between the traces is reduced. For real life engineering, theoretical calculations of per unit length inductance of traces in free space with no consideration of return path are worthless.

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week