Breaking News
Power Tips

Power Tip 69: A Simple Oversight Can Ruin EMI Performance

View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
GBrandly
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Adding primary filters
GBrandly   6/26/2014 2:51:47 PM
NO RATINGS
@dvandit: That was exactly the first thought that came to my mine when I read this. In this case I'd say the ends could well justify the means.  :)

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: good observations... but...
Sheetal.Pandey   3/13/2014 11:47:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Design review for EMI is a good to step to have in these complex designs. Yes the PCB layout makes lot of difference. Thanks to advancement in EDA tools, you can do a trial run on the layout before releasing the gerbers for PCB manufacturing.

Thinking_J
User Rank
Rookie
good observations... but...
Thinking_J   3/12/2014 7:13:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Looks like the second (improved) layout made space for additional magnetics (L100) .. but wasn't installed (instead a 100 ohm and a smt inductor/ ferrite bead was installed)

So the design is no longer the same size... (?) a compromise that many of us cannot obtain when faced with these problems...that helped get that 3x spacing improvement.

 

 

dvandit
User Rank
Manager
Adding primary filters
dvandit   3/12/2014 5:24:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder how many designs had a primary filter added and subseqently passed EMI only because components had to be moved to make room for the filter...

Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed