Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Power Tips

Power Tip 69: A Simple Oversight Can Ruin EMI Performance

View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
dvandit
User Rank
Manager
Adding primary filters
dvandit   3/12/2014 5:24:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder how many designs had a primary filter added and subseqently passed EMI only because components had to be moved to make room for the filter...

GBrandly
User Rank
Rookie
Re: Adding primary filters
GBrandly   6/26/2014 2:51:47 PM
NO RATINGS
@dvandit: That was exactly the first thought that came to my mine when I read this. In this case I'd say the ends could well justify the means.  :)

Thinking_J
User Rank
Rookie
good observations... but...
Thinking_J   3/12/2014 7:13:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Looks like the second (improved) layout made space for additional magnetics (L100) .. but wasn't installed (instead a 100 ohm and a smt inductor/ ferrite bead was installed)

So the design is no longer the same size... (?) a compromise that many of us cannot obtain when faced with these problems...that helped get that 3x spacing improvement.

 

 

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
Re: good observations... but...
Sheetal.Pandey   3/13/2014 11:47:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Design review for EMI is a good to step to have in these complex designs. Yes the PCB layout makes lot of difference. Thanks to advancement in EDA tools, you can do a trial run on the layout before releasing the gerbers for PCB manufacturing.

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week