A group of engineers is doing its part to help topple Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi
Fascinating story in today’s Wall Street Journal about Ousama Abushagur and his merry band of engineers who have hijacked Libya’s telecommunications infrastructure to get rebel fighters and others back online.
Margaret Coker and Charles Levinson report:
To make that possible, engineers hived off part of the Libyana cellphone network—owned and operated by the Tripoli-based Libyan General Telecommunications Authority, which is run by Col. Gadhafi's eldest son—and rewired it to run independently of the regime's control. Government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim, asked about the rebel cellphone network, said he hadn't heard of it.
Until that point, Col. Moammar Gadhafhi’s forces had taken control of the network, forcing rebels to communicate on the battlefield with a decidedly old-school technology: flags.
Abushagur, an Alabama-raised and educated engineer, conceived the idea on—what else does an engineer-entrepreneur use?—the back of a napkin and leveraged his network of engineers and Middle Eastern contacts to make it all happen. (A video of an interview with The Journal's Coker is below),
He went to a high school named after the legendary astronaut Gus Grissom and, from 1998-2004, studied electrical engineering at the University of Alabama Huntsville. There, he was a student research assistant at UAH’s Nano Micro Fabrication Facility, where he helped develop a coating procedure for fiber optic cable
He lists his current role as vice president of business development for AOGC, working with various multinational technology companies to introduce them to Middle East market.
So the next time you get that sinking feeling that no one appreciates engineers or that your work is undervalued, think of Abushagur and his engineers. While it’s still early in the Libyan rebellion, they may have made a huge difference.
Here's the thing. The history book is written by the winning side. If the rebels win, (and let's hope that doesn't lead to a bigger crackpot than ghadafi), they did the right thing. If they did the wrong thing, there's a good chance that they could face a firing squad...or WORSE. Either way, at least they didn't sit on the fence, and handwring abbout it. They took the initiative, and did what they thought was right, probably all too aware of what being on the wrong side would bring them.
Good grief, man, it's a REVOLUTION, and let's hope that a nation of people gets a better government out of the deal. They'd be stuck forever, if they had to listen to everyone whine about "I wonder what the legal implications are?"
Stealing airtime for your own private gain, is something to ask that question of.
It would be very good to read an very technical article describing the way they did this.
I don't exactly understand the legal implications behind this network recovery since basically what they did was to cut and re-route the communications but without the consent from the Col's ntwork,,, ,isn't this illegal?
The WSJ article says they investigated the legal implications also.... mmm
Quite interesting to know of this, I think we'll be hearing a little more soon.
January 2016 Cartoon Caption ContestBob's punishment for missing his deadline was to be tied to his chair tantalizingly close to a disconnected cable, with one hand superglued to his desk and another to his chin, while the pages from his wall calendar were slowly torn away.122 comments