Breaking News
Engineering Pop Culture!

What were they thinking: Slithering a snake

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
rich.pell
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
rich.pell   6/29/2013 3:50:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Snakes are actually very popular as pets, so I don't think I'd be so quick to dismiss this as an intentional joke. Whether the collar itself is actually practical or not is another question entirely!

ccalvin
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
ccalvin   6/21/2013 7:05:42 PM
NO RATINGS
While the collar-to-the-snake attachment is non-trivial, I think that I would prefer that tether (401) be rigid.

Battar
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
Battar   6/11/2013 6:09:34 AM
NO RATINGS
The text of the abstract and claim shows up the apparent inability of patent attorneys to construct a coherent sentence in English. They gain little respect among engineers whose job generally includes writing technicial specifications which are used to actually construct the invention. But why submit the application? How would you enforce it? I don't believe there is a market for these devices, and I would hesitate to take up a legal battle with someone whose hobbies include taking pet snakes for walks. (or slithers)

anon6223816
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
anon6223816   6/10/2013 7:25:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The USPTO pays for its operation with its fees. I suspect the examiner found no prior art. It serves a useful(?) purpose, and therefore has utility. Cha-ching goes the cash register -- thank you Mr. Inventor for playing today. Please play again. Bring money. ;-). I'd like to see the inventor put one of those on a reticulated python, or a black racer. "Slither", indeed.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
BrianBailey   6/10/2013 5:59:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Right - why would anyone care, so just issue it.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Slithering a snake
Duane Benson   6/8/2013 8:45:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I really wonder how some of these patents can be issued with a straight face. Nonsensical technical patents are one thing. It's not good, but I can understand how something gets through that sounds viable to a laymen but is nonsense to a highly skilled engineer. But a snake collar? From my perspective, it's either an intentional joke from the patent office, involved judicious amounts of alcohol or shoes that someone just plain doesn't care.

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll