Breaking News
Blog

E-beam: Ecosystem investment grows, but more neede

Blog
9/20/2010 11:05 PM EDT

 5 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
unknown multiplier
User Rank
Author
re: E-beam: Ecosystem investment grows, but more neede
unknown multiplier   11/15/2010 2:16:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Isn't it just one more random electron scattering factor?

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Author
re: E-beam: Ecosystem investment grows, but more neede
double-o-nothing   11/15/2010 1:06:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Charging is another inevitable factor that needs to be possibly captured by DFEB.

double-o-nothing
User Rank
Author
re: E-beam: Ecosystem investment grows, but more neede
double-o-nothing   9/23/2010 12:13:10 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a really nice piece, thanks very much. Perhaps some comments, more general in nature, are in order. First, going down below 40 nm, no matter what radiation you use, the resist is going to limit you, either in throughput or resolution. Particularly these chemically amplified types. Second, at the same dose, smaller features use less incident particles (photons, electrons, etc.) so are naturally more prone to random dose variations (sometimes called shot noise). Third, the CD vs dose model needs to be discussed much more openly especially as more critical features are being added.

Most Recent Comments
ConGa95054
 
r3son8trbluz
 
Some Guy
 
realjjj
 
Max The Magnificent
 
realjjj
 
rick merritt
 
Susan Rambo
 
Max The Magnificent

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed