Breaking News
Blog

Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 4 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
pixie1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
pixie1   4/28/2011 12:04:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm wondering why Nvidia is off the radar from this analysis. Its Project Denver is arguably much further down the planning and development path than anything AMD could start doing even yesterday. Also, Nvidia is claiming the entire high/low TDP range for Project Denver. Not only would it make it a much more ambitious project than what AMD could conceivably reconsider with ARM right now but it would be more complete as Nvidia already have an ARM-based portfolio.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
KB3001   4/27/2011 11:33:03 PM
NO RATINGS
AMD do not have to drop x86, why should they? That said, I think such deal will be more of an advantage to ARM than AMD. As for Intel, I would be very worried if I were in their shoes. I do not see increased x86 dominance as a blessing, certainly not in the mobile computing era.

dvmoo7
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
dvmoo7   4/27/2011 11:13:13 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a bad deal for AMD but good for ARM and Intel. AMD will be joining a long line of ARM licensee's all trying to out do one another with basically the same arch (ARM). AMD is currently in a market where it hold #2 (very distant but still #2) and has lots of experience at x86. They will be entering a crowed market which they have no expertice. Intel will pretty much own 100% of the x86 market at that point. ARM just gets sell yet another license.

ArtB_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
ArtB_#1   4/27/2011 8:43:15 PM
NO RATINGS
ARM based processors lend themselves to the low current requirements for smartphones, tablets, and small laptops. In this sense, AMD might benefit by being able to sell into this rapidly expanding market. However, there are lots of competitors with their own ARM based processors, including Apple, Qualcomm, Nvidia, and Samsung. Qualcomm has years and years of experience combining its Snapdragon (ARM based processor) with its modem chips on a single chip, with smaller size, lower current draw, and other features that offer challenges to less experienced competitors. What can AMD offer to survive in this market?

kkersey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
kkersey   4/27/2011 8:28:29 PM
NO RATINGS
I think this is a great strategy idea for AMD. They will not win a head-on competition with Intel, yet they have tremendous resources and skills at their disposal. Qualcomm has done a nice job with their Arm-Licensed Snapdragon processor...optimized for mobile use. AMD could choose another tangent such as chipsets for low-cost, low-power multiprocessor servers (like SeaMicro except using ARM's instead of ATOM's).

alan.varghese
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
alan.varghese   4/27/2011 4:39:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Another possibility is for AMD to support both architectures. They can support the x86 for markets such as PCs; and ARM for mobile computing and smartphones. Or augment their x86 product with an ARM processor; but that could turn out to be an expensive solution. For ARM this is a good move, because AMD would add another licensee to their ecosystem; moreover it can help them get into computing markets where they traditionally haven’t had much traction. For AMD it makes sense because its destiny will be defined by more than what its chief competitor (Intel) does. The only caveat for AMD would be that, they would now enter a chip space with a sea of competition including Broadcom, Freescale, Infineon, Qualcomm, Samsung, ST Micro, and TI.

Dumbpenis
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
Dumbpenis   4/27/2011 2:29:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe there is a need for benchmark software to help IT guys analyze their own wares to determine if AMD chips can do the jobs every bit as good as Intel's. AMD enjoys a very low market share in the server business to make me suspect a whole lot!! at 7% of the server market just do not jive !

Dumbpenis
User Rank
Rookie
re: Analysis: Why ARM-AMD makes sense
Dumbpenis   4/27/2011 2:27:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Most users can really save with AMD chips instead of Intel's because they dont really need Intel chips to do the jobs most of the times. IT teams often picked Intel chips just to play it safe but AMD chips can really do the jobs for less. Resellers seek to maximize revenues with higher priced Intel chips inside the throats of users.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll