Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 4 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
t.alex   5/21/2011 7:41:22 AM
NO RATINGS
One thing they can consider is to revamp the ugly x86 architecture.

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
agk   5/21/2011 7:38:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's focus on low power consuming 32 nm medfield for smart phones will be a boon to the smart phone manufactureres and users.

mikin
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
mikin   5/20/2011 7:04:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel already have a great DSP kernel inside x86 chips (IA32 or IA64) starting with MMX series since 1994, Robert. And it works well otherwise you should see the H264 movies only to DVD :P

Allen.Light
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
Allen.Light   5/20/2011 5:51:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Thunderbolt on iPhones and iPads? That would do wonders for your battery life. This technology may be 'royalty free' for Intel chip customers, but it is not an open standard - thus only one supplier for the chips - expect it to remain costly and un-popular until it's open like PCIe or USB.

wee cee
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
wee cee   5/20/2011 4:01:14 PM
NO RATINGS
What if Apple puts Thunderbolt on iPhones and iPads? Other OEMs are sure to follow.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
rick merritt   5/20/2011 3:54:46 AM
NO RATINGS
@doubleudot: We covered those peripheral folks. But still only one system OEM--Apple

kdian
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
kdian   5/20/2011 1:42:57 AM
NO RATINGS
Sony, Canon, WD, LaCie and others are apparently on the Thunderbolt bandwagon. Ya gotta keep up.

Aater (@FutureChips.org)
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
Aater (@FutureChips.org)   5/19/2011 6:03:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Like to point out that DSPs and Low-power general purpose processors are very different. DSPs have very different constraints like real-time, predictability, etc. They throw out a lot of what Intel is good at, e.g., speculative execution, branch prediction, etc. In contrast, doing a low power design is right up their ally as they have all ingredients except low power. I say Intel has a much stronger change here.

LarryM99
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
LarryM99   5/19/2011 6:00:14 PM
NO RATINGS
The software issue is something of a red herring regarding CPU selection. The platform is defined more by the OS than the CPU anymore. Change one compiler switch and recompile and most applications can speak ARM, as long as the OS libraries are consistent. Larry M.

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel: Under the smoke and mirrors
goafrit   5/19/2011 5:28:06 PM
NO RATINGS
They can get into anything they want through acquisitions. This is one company that anyone must respect because in their domain, they are very big

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week