Breaking News
Blog

When the smart money got into/out of manufacturing

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: When the smart money got into/out of manufacturing
Peter Clarke   9/5/2011 2:39:50 PM
NO RATINGS
@chipmonk I have had a go at answering your two questions but it was too long to post here. I have put it under its own heading http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4219627/Why-the-British-got-out-of-fabs

chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: When the smart money got into/out of manufacturing
chipmonk0   9/2/2011 4:19:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Would Peter Clarke rather answer why the British had to get out of Fabs and end up just with design / IP a la ARM ? Why Fabs still survive ( if not exactly thrive ) in the UK's traditional rival France ? Globalization seems to have reduced the US to the status of the UK

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: When the smart money got into/out of manufacturing
Peter Clarke   9/2/2011 1:04:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Well I didn't say I was going to come down on one side or the other!

rficPDX
User Rank
Rookie
re: When the smart money got into/out of manufacturing
rficPDX   9/1/2011 8:40:13 PM
NO RATINGS
And the answer is...the two companies are in very different areas of the semiconductor industry. IDT, as its name implies, is in the functional integration business. These days, the manufacturing technologies necessary for IDT's products are readily available from wafer foundries. A&O, on the other hand, is in the specialty device business - high power transistors and diodes, power converters, etc. The semiconductor processes necessary for these kinds of products are not as readily available from foundries - because in many cases these kinds of devices are for lower volume applications that don't demand large wafer volumes. And foundry pricing for these kinds of wafers is by no means set at commodity levels, as the foundries offering these technologies typically do so on an opportunistic basis. This deal wasn't about IDT dumping a fab to A&O for pocket lint. IDT's business takes it towards fabless, while as A&O continues to grow it needs more control over its technology and cost model.

pixies
User Rank
Rookie
re: When the smart money got into/out of manufacturing
pixies   9/1/2011 5:17:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, contrary to what the title indicates, this article did not answer why the two companies took different paths, but simply pointed out the difference, and left the "why" to the "detail of the fab,..."

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll