Breaking News
Blog

Top 10 CE innovation gadgets at CES

Biscotti TV Phone
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 10 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 3
DerpDerpDerpy
User Rank
Author
re: Top 10 CE innovation gadgets at CES
DerpDerpDerpy   12/10/2011 6:58:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Did you know that the judges for the Innovations awards don't even get a hands-on with the product? They simply send over spec sheets and the judges have to basically "guess" what products will be great for 2012. If you ask me, it's an absolute joke. Thus, consumer disasters like the Google TV somehow snuck into the mix.

Stephen_M
User Rank
Author
re: Top 10 CE innovation gadgets at CES
Stephen_M   12/10/2011 1:16:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with you. The headsets were MSRP $600 and that puts it out of consideration for me.

Bob Lacovara
User Rank
Author
re: Top 10 CE innovation gadgets at CES
Bob Lacovara   12/9/2011 7:53:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps I'm just an old, cranky engineer, fixed (or rusted?) into my ways, but I couldn't work up more than a yawn for all but two of these goodies. The Lytro camera is interesting from a technology standpoint, but I am not sure just how widespread it will become. Certainly, the bulk of photos are "just" snapshots, and no one gives a hoot about changing their focus: you just shoot the thing again. Of course, there are applications where after the fact focus would be important, but why not just focus the whole image? That's not always artistic, but it's more economic than dinking about after you snap the shutter. I like the technology, though, and Ng's thesis is a neat read. The other device that I can see of some practical value are the Sennheiser wireless headsets. I could use that... I sometimes want to watch a movie after the kids are in bed, and I don't always want to turn the volume down into the noise. The other items: well, they are nifty, or neat, or cool, but not for me. Overall, it would be interesting to see which of these make it to this point next year.

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Author
re: Top 10 CE innovation gadgets at CES
nicolas.mokhoff   12/9/2011 6:06:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Sometimes we have different expectations. I'd like to hear from readers on whether these consumer electronics devices would make a difference in your lives.

<<   <   Page 3 / 3
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed