Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets

Bolaji Ojo
1/11/2012 11:23 PM EST

 19 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
kdboyce
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
kdboyce   1/12/2012 12:45:28 AM
NO RATINGS
Playing through and playing where the ball lies takes on new meaning if your lab is next to a golf course.

_hm
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
_hm   1/12/2012 2:04:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel should have first tried with Tablet market. Also this is very low margin business. How long Intel will like it?

daleste
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
daleste   1/12/2012 3:13:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, it is very low margin. And it is also very demanding. But is it high volume. Look at the companies that walked away from this business, Freescale and TI. Intel has a lot of cash, but this may be more than they have the stomach to invest in.

Charles.Desassure
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
Charles.Desassure   1/12/2012 5:05:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow! This is great news. More power.

chipmonk0
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
chipmonk0   1/12/2012 5:31:28 PM
NO RATINGS
This is trench warfare ( attrition ), Intel has to get into smartphones and tablets not to make same level of profit as for CPUs but to deny upstarts ARM and TSMC future viability. Even if it takes $ 20 billion and 5 years to get there it would be well worth it for the future of Intel. They have the money in the bank for such a strategy. Technologies like finFET and low power dissipation transistors and architectures are the foundation for it. Once Intel brings out Medfield at 20 nm later this year, it will be very hard for system builders now tied to fabless processor vendors ( who get their chips made by TSMC, now 2 nodes behind Intel ) or even integrated vendors ( Samsung ), to ignore it.

emerson1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
emerson1   1/12/2012 7:37:04 PM
NO RATINGS
AMD is winner here too! this will prepare the software/developer battlefield so to speak, for other x86 chipsets for mobile to enter as well.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
chanj0   1/12/2012 10:44:57 PM
NO RATINGS
The consumer gets to choose who's the winner. If Intel doesn't fail to deliver a comparable power saving product to any ARM based product, Intel might have a chance. Otherwise, how many people are going to buy it? Another factor would be the availability of apps and, in particular, free apps. I am happy to see more competition. At the end, consumers win. ;)

bigdada1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
bigdada1   1/12/2012 10:50:49 PM
NO RATINGS
It's a lower margin business. It made no sense to use advanced technologies for the purpose of lower power consumption. 22 nm nodes' will be at least 40% more expensive than 32nm and 14 nm would be even much more when EUV litho kicks in. They should run the PC/server CPUs on new technology nodes and use the older generation technology at depreciated fabs to run lower margin products. Why can't Intel push the design architecture to get lower power same as ARM?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
resistion   1/13/2012 2:58:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's 14 nm will be more expensive because of multi-patterning (EUV not ready for 14 nm). 22 nm is not cheap either.

PHW_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
PHW_#1   1/13/2012 6:06:25 AM
NO RATINGS
All 4 core APU for smartphone will start shipping using 28nm 2012. it still can't handle the full-HD 3D graphic. Smart phone application is still pushing for better & faster chips even in low power application. Your cost analysis is only right for foundries' node migration. It doesn't necessary right to compare Intel 22nm vs foundry's 32nm. Intel delayed two generation immersion litho (compared to foundries) introduction just to save cost. Intel does follow Moore's law in perfomance/cost/schedule so far. and multi-patterning is required in too many critical layers from 28/22nm in foundries, you don't need to be in 14nm.....

ibm221
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
ibm221   1/13/2012 12:01:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Paul Otellini here looks like a humble high school kid, waiting to see his class project get approved. how ironic...

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
resistion   1/13/2012 3:06:09 AM
NO RATINGS
The Atoms weren't such high performers in notebooks, and they are not known to be power-competitive against ARM, so it's a tight squeeze for Intel.

Vancouver
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
Vancouver   1/13/2012 3:20:00 AM
NO RATINGS
There are two monopoly words used in this article aimed at Intel. While ARM monopoly in the wireless sector is rewarded with words such as "maintain leading position". This aritcle is not meant to inform readers, but rather, to pre-empt Intel in order to pave the way for future lawsuits from ARM and AMD against Intel. I buy and support Intel products because of the jobs issue. The jobs created in the US from ARM and AMD is a drop in a bucket compare to jobs that Intel created. If you want to support jobs growth in the US, buy tech. products that contain Intel chips.

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
selinz   1/13/2012 7:58:16 PM
NO RATINGS
This is all consistent trend toward more and more powerful handhelds. Just big enough to fit in my pocket with as much power as possible, thank you...

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Manager
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
elctrnx_lyf   1/15/2012 8:25:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Little confusing article.. Is the author is talking about the wireless chips or processor market segment?

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
Robotics Developer   1/16/2012 5:41:36 PM
NO RATINGS
The article is talking about Intel getting into the wireless market, but not wireless technology; Intel is going to be in the handhelds and tablets that traditionally have been ARM based. I can't say what the power/performance tradeoff numbers are between Atom and the new/future generation of ARM cores, but I have an Atom based laptop that is not very impressive (as a laptop mind you). I think if the OS and system design delivers speed and long battery life then Intel will have a winner, if not then they will not achieve the success they aim for.

knowledge
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel muscles into smartphones, tablets
knowledge   1/31/2012 5:44:29 AM
NO RATINGS
great....

Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll