Breaking News
Blog

Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
lcovey
User Rank
Rookie
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
lcovey   1/21/2012 3:37:14 AM
NO RATINGS
A tiny virus can take down an elephant, but the point is well taken. ARM's true strength, however, is their ability to grow and use their partner relationships. When you add that to equation, ARM dwarfs everyone.

luting
User Rank
CEO
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
luting   1/21/2012 4:39:47 AM
NO RATINGS
ARM might be only 2000 employees. But you add up all people are working on ARM derived product. It is not that much smaller than Intel.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
KB3001   1/21/2012 10:31:45 AM
NO RATINGS
It is indeed the power of its network that can rival with Intel, not ARM on its own. That said, many people think ARM is much bigger (revenue and profit-wise) than it is in reality. Taken on its own, it is indeed a very small company compared with the likes of Intel, Google and Microsoft.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
Bert22306   1/22/2012 12:07:14 AM
NO RATINGS
"So, which is it?" It's a case of comparing apples with oranges. ARM holds IP. Intel builds all manner of finished products. But here's a thought. Remember back when there was this fierce battle between RISC and CISC? At that time, the battle between the two raged for products that looked essentially like desktop PCs, as well as for embedded applications. What happened then was that the performance of CISC chips became comparable with that of RISC, and the CISC won the war. I think, this is very much the same sort of war. ARM is RISC, but its simplicity used to reduce power demands rather than to achieve greater performance. The move now goes to CISC, i.e. x86, to even that score. This seems to be what Intel is claiming they have done. Last time they succeeded with performance. They may well make it with power requirements this time around. I wouldn't count them out.

abraxalito
User Rank
Rookie
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
abraxalito   1/24/2012 2:31:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's problem is addiction to the higher margins of its processors. Its the same problem that has driven Kodak into bankruptcy - they had the effective monopoly of film processing with 70% margins: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jan/22/john-naughton-kodak-lessons

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
resistion   1/24/2012 4:44:11 AM
NO RATINGS
It's a valid point, but here "RISC" (ARM) is already more popular than "CISC" (Atom) so it's a different starting point than the previous CPU case, which was the other way around.

panzerboy
User Rank
Rookie
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
panzerboy   1/24/2012 12:41:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Can we please put this "CISC won the war with RISC" myth to bed. Intel won by adopting a RISC core and translating x86 instructions into RISC "micro-ops". So in fact RISC won the war by adding on the fly instruction translation.

panzerboy
User Rank
Rookie
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
panzerboy   1/24/2012 1:04:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Will Intel try to compete with ARM at all levels? Even down to the ultra low power Cortex M0 level? Bring back the 386SX! :-) Seriously though, I think the one big piece of disruptive technology could be the battery. Batteries just have to get better for the automotive market. Even 2X the storage of today's batteries could make a lot of ARM's power efficiency irrelevant, or at least buy extra peformance that Intel is better positioned to exploit. Intel can obviously build a competent RISC core. I cant see that saddling it with the x86 instruction set brings anything of worth in the mobile market. With Android and Metro being the likely environments. It would be just as easy to develop new Android applications on a new Intel RISC platform. Unless you want to run Excel and Word on your phone. Perhaps a PC-Phone that docks or bluetooths to keyboard screen combo, or to a virtual window of the nearest PC? The future belongs to multiprocessors, Tilera is making 64 core chips now. In that game, whoever can build cores with the least transistors wins by packing more of them on a die. That sounds more like ARM than Intel.

the lavender fan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Opinion: ARM is no longer an underdog
the lavender fan   1/24/2012 9:17:49 PM
NO RATINGS
That future won't materialize until the software industry makes a breakthrough in multicore programming. Right now, there is no easy way to efficiently scale a piece of software for multiple cores. It's too early to say anyone has an edge.

More Blogs
Great ideas for new wearables or connected electronic devices can die on the vine if designers neglect manufacturability and product availability.
The standard, ubiquitous cooking oven is not only inefficient but also does a poor job. The how and why is a revealing discussion of tradition versus realities of thermal physics.
Reporting from Super Mobility Week, Steve Bell gives us insights into the market realities of connected cars.
BMW Welt and BMW Museum, located next to BMW headquarters and its engine/automobile plant, has reportedly become a popular destination for tourists visiting Bavaria, almost rivaling King Ludwig's 19th century Neuschwanstein Castle.
Online sourcing site Octopart inaugurates a Common Parts Library (CPL) for OEMs.
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll