Breaking News
Blog

Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
dblaza1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
dblaza1   4/20/2012 5:27:04 PM
NO RATINGS
This is the ultimate clash of business models; open source vs. paid, who wins will affect what we all pay for code

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
Robotics Developer   4/20/2012 5:42:59 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems pretty clear to me that the documents cited in the Oracle pdf file from Google indicate that Google knew and was originally looking to license Java APIs etc. I am wondering how Google thinks they can avoid this type of patent lawsuit (especially given the popularity of Android AND the fragmentation it causes). Anyone have insight on this?

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
Robotics Developer   4/20/2012 5:47:04 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems pretty clear to me that Google knew it needed licenses from their own emails cited in the Oracle pdf file. Why did they not just pay for it up front? I would love to know/understand how they can think otherwise. I may not have Patents but I hope that something as clear as this is settled quickly and fairly. I would hate to think that this could happen to something I had developed.

betajet
User Rank
CEO
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
betajet   4/20/2012 6:01:13 PM
NO RATINGS
IMO groklaw.net is the best place to read about the history of this case and the current goings-on at the trial including play-by-play reporting by volunteers. Addressing the patent question, my understanding is that most of the patents Oracle asserted have been found invalid by reexamination by the USPTO, one may be found invalid, and the other Google claims not to infringe. It's very dangerous to assert patents against Google since they are in such a good position to search for and find prior art, rendering the patent invalid.

jdesbonnet
User Rank
Manager
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
jdesbonnet   4/20/2012 6:04:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Please note that Florian Mueller is not exactly an impartial observer. See this post at Groklaw: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120419070127103

PJames
User Rank
Rookie
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
PJames   4/20/2012 9:43:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Can't argue that a movie that pits Mothra against Godzilla isn't a lot of fun to watch.

markhahn0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
markhahn0   4/21/2012 3:13:41 AM
NO RATINGS
imagine a "sporting" contest like cock fighting, except monkeys in the ring. and they battle by throwing feces at each other. _that_ is why I don't like following this patent fight.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
rick merritt   4/21/2012 5:24:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the link

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
t.alex   4/22/2012 3:09:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Oracle made a smart move buying over Sun sometime back. Now it's time to claim a lot of things..

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Three things are clear in Oracle vs. Google
KB3001   4/22/2012 4:59:16 PM
NO RATINGS
As a consumer, I hope Oracle loses the case! The precedent this case would set if Orcale wins it is just too dreadful to contemplate!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.