Breaking News
Blog

Debating Olympic technology

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: Debating Olympic technology
george.leopold   7/25/2012 8:46:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Reminds me a bit of the "Saturday Night Live" skit about the "All-Drug Olympics." Main difference is your variation wouldn't be illegal.

DataBass
User Rank
Rookie
re: Debating Olympic technology
DataBass   7/25/2012 7:11:15 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps there should be an Olympic category for enhanced/augmented people. Items such as the carbon fiber blades, I suspect, have much more "rebound", lacking a better term, than an normal achiles tendon. As such, the technology is providing a definite advantage over the un-augmented competitor. Taking this to a silly extreme, what about the competitor who has roller skates put on the end of his/her prosthesis? Just keep augmented and unaugmented competititions separate.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
re: Debating Olympic technology
wilber_xbox   7/25/2012 4:46:35 PM
NO RATINGS
These sports are to test the human endurance and capabilities. Aiding the effort with technology would undermine the purpose itself.

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: Debating Olympic technology
george.leopold   7/25/2012 3:55:35 PM
NO RATINGS
To a large extent, they are.

askubel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Debating Olympic technology
askubel   7/25/2012 3:36:49 PM
NO RATINGS
The Olympics is about countries competing to be the best at a particular sport. Why shouldn't engineers be part of that competition?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll