Breaking News
Blog

Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Flaps
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
Flaps   11/13/2012 12:05:03 AM
NO RATINGS
It isn't surprising that Beijing doesn't want to increase the yuan's value. China and the US are intimate financial partners. China owns about $1T in US govt securities (yes, $1 trillion). Increasing the value of the yuan decreases the value of those securities directly. There's an old saying: "If you owe the bank $50,000, the bank owns you. If you owe the bank $50,000,000, you own the bank."

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Blogger
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
SylvieBarak   11/12/2012 5:27:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Hey, it's a buyer's market... I think China is being really smart, diversifying assets and buying while stakes are cheap. I remember when I used to play the board game Monopoly with my sisters, and it used to drive me mad that my younger sister used to buy every single thing she landed on. It looked willy nilly. But lo and behold, she'd win almost every game thanks to that strategy. You invest your way our of a crisis. You invest to win in the long run. These are two lessons the U.S. would do well to learn. China certainly seems to know the rules....

de_la_rosa
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
de_la_rosa   11/11/2012 8:38:11 PM
NO RATINGS
this 2 page article can be shortened to: "China is investing more in the USA".

me3
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
me3   11/10/2012 5:03:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Now you know why the Chinese would not increase the value of their currency. All they need to do is look at the Japanese and say NO WAY!

george.leopold
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
george.leopold   11/10/2012 12:55:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I also remember the Japan paranoia of the late 1980s along the "The Japan That Can Say 'No'". Japan was a bubble ready to burst. Today, China finds itself in a similar situation as the U.S. seeks to leverage its entrepreneurial advantages.

tb1
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
tb1   11/9/2012 11:37:42 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember back when Japan was buying a lot of industries in the US back around 1989 (including the Rockefeller Center!) and it created a lot of paranoia. Then the Japanese economy collapsed about 7 years later, and they were forced to sell off a lot of their assets at a big loss (including the Rockefeller Center).

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Beijing's U.S. investments and economic security
Bert22306   11/9/2012 10:55:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Not sure I understand your last paragraph. In a partnership, both sides have to see a continued benefit. From what you describe here, though, it sounds more like "we are continuing to sell off the farm." Here's the quote: "Indeed, economic and energy security appear to be the long-term concerns. For example, the report described Chinese investments in three energy technologies. Eventually, the authors said, production based on the acquired technology was shifted to China." Of course this makes sense from China's point of view. But what is the long-term prospect for these US industries? IP now owned by the Chinese government? Ultimately, naturally, the resolution will come as China's labor costs reach closer parity to our own. Either because theirs rise or because ours fall.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Navigate to Related Links

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed