Breaking News
Blog

Yoshida in China: China Mobile holds key to LTE winners

China Mobile calls the shots
NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: China Mobile holds key to LTE winners
junko.yoshida   12/5/2012 8:45:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Oops I pasted a wrong link above. Here is the correct one on the interview with weili dai at Marvell: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4399226/Marvell-co-founder---Don-t-bet-against-us-

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: China Mobile holds key to LTE winners
junko.yoshida   11/20/2012 9:59:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, correct. However, that chip you mentioned in the link above does not support TD-LTE yet. The company is working on the genuine multi-standard, multifrequency solution, but its TD-LTE is still going through the certification procss. That has been confirmed by Weili Dai in the following, more recent story: http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-products/electronic-product-reviews/rf-microwave-products/4394229/Marvell-unified-3G-platform-supports-TD-SCDMA-and-WCDMA

markwrob
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: China Mobile holds key to LTE winners
markwrob   11/20/2012 9:15:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi Junko, I was reminded that recently MRVL announced a unified platform for wireless, would it be a good thing to add to the related stories list here? http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-products/electronic-product-reviews/rf-microwave-products/4394229/Marvell-unified-3G-platform-supports-TD-SCDMA-and-WCDMA

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed