Breaking News
Blog

Yoshida in China: Nokia TD-SCDMA phones might bite Apple

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Nokia TD-SCDMA phones might bite Apple
junko.yoshida   12/6/2012 3:13:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi, Sanjib. The number "200 million customers" I threw in the story is partly driven by the massive shift currently occuring among China Mobile users swtiching from 2G to TD-SCDMA. As for Samsung in China? They are doing really well.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Nokia TD-SCDMA phones might bite Apple
Sanjib.A   12/6/2012 2:43:29 AM
NO RATINGS
After a long time I am seeing a strategic decision that is going in favor of Nokia. But not sure for how long as 200 million customers in China switch their handset every year! By the way, how is Samsung doing in China?

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Nokia TD-SCDMA phones might bite Apple
junko.yoshida   12/5/2012 7:26:46 PM
NO RATINGS
As I wrote in the story, it's not the technical issue that Apple doesn't have TD-SCDMA iPhones. It's a partnership deal Apple has been unable to make with China Mobile.

sbky
User Rank
Author
re: Yoshida in China: Nokia TD-SCDMA phones might bite Apple
sbky   12/5/2012 6:33:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think it would be that hard since both phones (920T and iphone5) use Qualcomm-based chipsets/technology for the modems.

SylvieBarak
User Rank
Blogger
re: Yoshida in China: Nokia TD-SCDMA phones might bite Apple
SylvieBarak   12/5/2012 6:03:57 PM
NO RATINGS
How difficult is it for Apple to come out with a TD-SCDMA compatible phone model though? I shouldn't think it would be that difficult if they really wanted to. But this is a really good deal for Nokia.... while it lasts.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed