Breaking News
Blog

London Calling: How many years define a startup?

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
DrQuine   2/18/2013 4:20:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps we should be talking about "innovative technology start-ups". If I start another bakery, laundry, grocery store, or car dealership, the venture capitalists don't care and my business may putter along for a generation as a privately held company. The characteristic of "innovative technology start-ups" is that they have grand visions to do something new (big enough to interest investors), need capital to build the business, and therefore pass through the various funding stages that merit "start-up" labeling.

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
jackOfManyTrades   2/12/2013 7:56:30 AM
NO RATINGS
What do I think? I think this seems to be what I call a "freewill problem". People often ask whether we have "freewill". Well, we take in information, store it, process it and act on it. It that fits your arbitary definition of "freewill" then we do have it; if it doesn't, we don't. Likewise, with this, we seem to have arbitarily come up with a word first and then seem to be debating whether the real world fits our arbitary definition. Why not do it the other way round?

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
Duane Benson   2/11/2013 7:08:50 PM
NO RATINGS
re: "more about financial maturity than it is about how many years have elapsed." For the most part, I tend to agree with this statement. "Start-up" is more of a phase or state of mind than it is a count of days. However, at some point, it begins to look like the equivalent of an adult still sucking his or her thump. Yes, the company is still in start-up mode, but has been there so long that it just comes off looking immature and ridiculous. When that point hits, is a pretty fuzzy number though. I'd pick five years as a rough appropriate length of time for a company to call itself a start-up. I would also agree with Betajet that some start-ups use the term long past when they should as an excuse to exploit employees.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
Peter Clarke   2/11/2013 9:32:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Obviously timings differ from company to company and sector to sector, but I think I broadly agree.

EREBUS0
User Rank
Rookie
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
EREBUS0   2/10/2013 8:38:47 PM
NO RATINGS
The short answer is when the company actually gets off the ground, makes money and can grow without further investment. By definition, you are a business, though still learning if you are lucky. Some startups just never make the transition. Predicting the reasons for failure are the issues that Venture Capitalist always assess before they invest. Smart people are just not enough unless they are backed up with solid financial management, clear goals for success, and a clearly defined market place. Anything less usually ends in failure. Just my opinion.

Comfortable
User Rank
Rookie
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
Comfortable   2/9/2013 3:49:43 AM
NO RATINGS
It has been my experience that any venture funded startup that doesn't begin to monetize the investment by the end of the third year has failed on their initial plan and are down a modified path either to (a) follow the unexpected turn of events or (b) try to find someway to recover the investment. Consequently, I think a startup (venture funded) ceases to be a startup when the original business plan has been determined to not be viable. This is of course rarely public knowledge for obvious reasons.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
krisi   2/8/2013 7:20:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Excitement is difficult to measure so I will drop by...only Equity counts

betajet
User Rank
CEO
re: London Calling: How many years define a startup?
betajet   2/8/2013 5:32:11 PM
NO RATINGS
IMO, a start-up is characterized by a "double E": Excitement and Equity. All employees of the start-up must be excited because they're doing something new and fun, and something that will make so much money that they'll be able to spend the rest of their lives doing what they please. This latter requires Equity, where all employees will share in the wealth of what they're working so hard to create. Without both parts of the "double E", there's no incentive to invest the time and energy required: it's just a job. Some companies like to portray themselves as having a "start-up" environment, but too often use this to mean ridiculously long hours doing boring work that will only make a few rich. JMO/YMMV

More Blogs
An engineer discovers amazing schematics and documentation pasted to the back of a 92-year-old organ originally installed in a San Francisco vaudeville house.
A comparison of Intel's recent Core M to its original Pentium M from a decade ago provides some perspective on how far the company and the semiconductor industry have come, says analyst Nathan Brookwood.
Product design is more important now than ever, thanks to the increasing popularity of wearable technology.
The Nymi is a wristband that uses your cardiac rhythm or your unique heartbeat to identify who you are and then relays your identity to any connected technology you own via Bluetooth.
While creating an Arduino-based art project, Guido Bonelli realized there was a need for a special test shield to help debug his system. A Kickstarter project was born.
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll