Among just those in electronics, 30 percent said their biggest source of stress is the volume of their workload, ahead of deadline and office politics (tied for second at 16 percent). I routinely tell people in my 20+ years watching this industry I have never seen as much going on in as many diverse areas at this level of complexity and moving this fast. It’s a 24/7/365 fire hose.
It’s a mixed bag when it comes to whether the technology itself helps or hinders the technologist.
Eighty-seven percent of electronics managers said it enables them to work smarter and get more done in less time and be more flexible with their schedules. But 40 percent said technology hurts their work/life balance because they are always accessible, and 35 percent said that creates a burden on their free time.
Indeed thanks to my iPhone and ThinkPad and the wide availability of cellular and Wi-Fi links I can work almost anywhere, anytime. Sometimes that’s a great thing, other times not so much.
At the end of the day, people in the overall survey seemed more happier than they did a year ago. Fifty-three percent of women and 50 percent of men said they are satisfied with their jobs and not looking for new opportunities, compared to 43 percent of women and 41 percent of men in Accenture's 2012 research.
How about you? Are you looking for a new job? A Workaholics Anonymous meeting? Or just the gumption to turn off the smartphone and go for a nice long walk?
Working for a few hours on weekends, for no pay, is not an imposition if the work can be conducted efficently and if you do it voluntarily. Seems to me that to qualify as a workaholic, a person has to consider himself almost like a martyr. But if you do the work because you feel like it and it's fun anyway, pretty tough to consider yourself a workaholic. Unless you enjoy that term, for some reason.
“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life.” ? Confucius
But that's not always the reason people work long hours. If you are working long hours and it's NOT for the above reason, there's something wrong.
Engineers love a challenge. Chasing down a bug successfully can consume hours before you realize it.
There are also "business" reasons for forcing overtime, but in my experience, you seldom get any real benefit for the extra hours you force people to work.
Now when they work because they are excited about the project, thats just magic.
Companies need to encourage the magic without using a whipp. The results benefit all concerned.
Just my opinion.
Yes, engineers tend to put in a lot of hours because they love their work, but many companies take advantage of that to get free labor. Also, when the job market is like it is now, engineers put in more hours to avoid being the next casualty.
I always pick companies where work is not required after hours. I work 8 hours a day (plus 30min for break) and go home. Not a minute longer. I enjoy my time during work but that's about it. I can't even access email outside work and don't answer phone over hours - to be honest nobody even expects it.
I try to be efficient in work but it's just work so I set the deadlines in a way that I can have time to learn while making projects (reading EE Times included) to make myself even more efficient and employable.
Work/life balance has always been a struggle for as long as I've been in this profession. I have to say though, I appreciate the benefits that technology has brought us that make it easier to achieve that balance.
In the old days, if you needed to put in extra hours, you either went in extra early or stayed until well after dark -- and missed out on family dinners or dropping kids off at school. Today we are untethered. If you have a conference call with Europe in the morning or with India in the evening, nobody cares where you are when you're doing it. When it's time to leave the office and go home to the family, you just go -- and do the call from wherever you are when it's time to dial in.
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.