Breaking News
Blog

The go-to guy

John Dunn
1/20/2011 09:32 PM EST

 20 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Flurmy
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
Flurmy   1/28/2011 10:20:14 AM
NO RATINGS
...of degree higher than FIVE.

maryl19
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
maryl19   1/27/2011 5:59:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I wholeheartedly agree with the above list. We had an Engineer at our company who regularly reduced testers to tears when they dared to “complain” about problems in the system. The man was brilliant, but no one wanted to interact with him and consequently no one wanted him on their team.

bcarso
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
bcarso   1/26/2011 5:20:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Sounds like a very second-rate maths guy who is compensating with arrogance, a frightfully dangerous combination. I encountered, indirectly, someone who gave wrong information to a friend about a puzzle in geometry. As best as I could understand it, he was presented the puzzle and, not being clever enough to figure it out on the spot, went on about the theory of tesselations of the plane, blah blah, which dazzled the non-math friend, the latter duly repeating the entirely inapplicable packet in a chatroom. I argued that the maths guy should be ashamed for adopting the defensive and quite-wrong ruse, and instead should have said "I don't know", and then perhaps gone off and figured the thing out (this was the famous problem where triangles that are part of rectangles are assembled in two different ways, to seemingly produce two areas differing by one square unit). And shame on the math guy here for not knowing a little Galois theory and the implications for general polynomials of degree higher than four. Even if that was not in his field of specialization, it's certainly something to which he'd been exposed and could easily come up in a PhD oral.

AhmadNasser
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
AhmadNasser   1/26/2011 3:44:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Mathematics is superior to Engineering, but Mathematicians are not superior to Engineers. An Engineer is a Mathematician by nature, the opposite is not necessarily true.

Cezar Palconet
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
Cezar Palconet   1/26/2011 7:20:13 AM
NO RATINGS
okay, so he is good, in fact better....okay I like to see him weld aluminum and solder a stainless steel drum. we engineers are capable of that too just like that over, our top.. see how a mathematician do that....

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
old account Frank Eory   1/25/2011 5:16:56 PM
NO RATINGS
To that list I would add: 3. He needs to be able to work effectively as a member of a team. In a modern-day organization, rather than being the "go-to" guy, an employee like this would more likely be on the short list for termination.

Bear1959
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
Bear1959   1/25/2011 2:59:42 PM
NO RATINGS
A good analyst (engineer, mathmetician, or any other expert) consists of two things: 1. He know his subject matter. 2. He knows how to EFFECTIVELY communicate that knowledge to others. And part of being effective is having a genuine goal and desire to help others gain knowledge instead of being a "show-off."

_hm
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
_hm   1/24/2011 6:23:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Different people have different set of specialized skill set and there in nothing wrong in getting their help. To an organization it saves time and money. However, once in while, you may be little better of then go-to guy or an expert. It does not mean that they are no good at all. No one is omnicient. And even experts do make simple mistakes in hurry. But one should not take it so hard. Another aspect is communication skills. Employing most suitable words and tone is very important. However, again some pople lack it. It this things happen many times, he may not be good in the subject. But with effort, we do get good go-to guy.

kdboyce
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
kdboyce   1/24/2011 5:36:29 AM
NO RATINGS
I had the good fortune to work with a good mathematician in very practical cascaded narrow band filter work. The problem was that even though he explained it very well I was not good enough to understand it all, let alone retain it much after the project was done. Like the engineer in the example above, I found a couple of good filter books to help me out when needed.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: The go-to guy
t.alex   1/23/2011 12:49:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Sounds too arrogant of the mathematician.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
More Blogs
The future could hold some scary scenarios as well as extremely exciting possibilities that may enable humankind to achieve new heights.
While Qualcomm may be late to the embedded market, it brings with it some interesting attributes that will appeal to a number of designers.
Here’s a list of the five biggest challenges facing the new generation of 25G Ethernet products in hopes they will be addressed sooner rather than later.
The first EDICON, covering RF, Signal/power integrity, and EMI, was a bit flat. But then, it was the first in the U.S.
Apple’s decision to remove the 3.5 mm headphone connector on the new iPhone 7, while continuing to use their proprietary Lightning connector, could mean more electronic waste as users discard their old headsets and many OEMs rush to develop new ones using Apple’s connector.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed