Breaking News
Blog

3DTV? A complete non-starter

David Blaza
1/25/2011 03:30 PM EST

 37 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
old account Frank Eory   1/25/2011 4:48:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I didn't catch the glasses-free Toshiba 3D at CES, but Sony's little 22.5 inch no-glasses 3D display was impressive. I could still see the 3D effect and no double image from about a 45 degree angle to either side. But I agree with your conclusion that 3D is a non-starter, at least for the next few years. It suffers from many of the same issues we faced with HDTV in the early years -- lack of content and high equipment prices. I first saw HD content on an HD display in 1997, but I did not personally buy an HDTV until 2004. I don't know if the lag time will be as long for me to take the 3D plunge, or if the price premium for 3D without glasses will ever be low enough to compel me to make a purchase. The transition from standard def to high-def was revolutionary, but the same cannot be said for the transition (if indeed it is a transition) from 2D to 3D.

BicycleBill
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
BicycleBill   1/25/2011 5:52:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice to see that someone in the industry has the guts to say that the 3D emperor has no clothes,that it is a "solution" to a problem the customers don't seem to think they have, that's it's really more of a whipped-up marketing push than a needed or useful product. You may be barred from next year's CES....

JMWilliams
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
JMWilliams   1/25/2011 6:05:27 PM
NO RATINGS
The basic problem is that the experience just isn't worth the trouble. With ordinary 2-D movies, everyone PERCEIVES depth anyway; we watch the action and see things as though in depth. There isn't any need for physical 3-dimensional images. What causes us to like a movie is the plot, the screenplay, and the acting -- and none of these requires physically real depth. As for other forms of entertainment, who cares whether actors sitting around on a talk show are three-dimensional or not? It's the same with the Sunday funnies: Cartoons are ridiculously unrealistic; but, we understand the activities depicted frame-by-frame in grossly unphysical 2-D, and we read them anyway.

Lalan_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
Lalan_#1   1/25/2011 7:34:06 PM
NO RATINGS
My take is that: Consumer 3D was at a serious mood at CES-2011 to say the least. Brushing it off on various grounds would be a mistake. When a 3D camera is available under $500, 3D is certainly poised to take off. It is the user and their own contents that is gonna rule while professional grade 3D contents are in the making. Just think, how much time does an average user spend on youtube vs. TV these days? ...hope you see what I am pointing to. 3D is at a great beginning, I think. With this we have a great opportunity of innovation. Let us get serious folks!!!

Athlor
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
Athlor   1/25/2011 10:17:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I really like the analogy to quadraphonic sound systems. It's here, it works, people like it BUT it's expensive, there's little content and there's incompatibility problems. Likewise, I expect it to go away, people laugh at how the ridiculus the idea was and it will come back in 20 years, like surround sound.

Bob Virkus
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
Bob Virkus   1/25/2011 10:43:59 PM
NO RATINGS
A large problem with 3D is that too often the technology drives the content with the story being, at best, secondary. 3D has to come to the point where it is just there, part of the background (and foreground I guess)and you are so involved with the story you no longer pay attention to the 3D. I've heard, however, the 3D sports is a lot of fun, especially golf (go figure). The SuperBowl has sold thousands of big-screen TVs, maybe it will kick-off 3D sales (sorry for the pun, it just kind of fell off my fingers).

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
krisi   1/25/2011 11:50:30 PM
NO RATINGS
I think 3D-TV has larger problems than lack of content...I tried a few systems and I get dizzy...quite unpleasant and unnatural experience...I highly doubt I am special so there must millions people like me who will not ever buy it...I think it is a classic of "let's build it and they will come"...Kris

hikerBob
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
hikerBob   1/26/2011 2:25:29 AM
NO RATINGS
I only recently upgraded to a HD TV. I am not going to trash it so I can upgrade to 3D TV. It is a nice effect for a movie theatre, but I cannot see the point of watching most TV content in 3D.

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
agk   1/26/2011 5:43:41 AM
NO RATINGS
The 3D projection of scenes or films will come a day using holographical techniques. The images will be projected in a space in front of us. That is real 3D. But what ever is done on a LCD panel or a screen of 2 dimensions is not a 3D

steven605
User Rank
Rookie
re: 3DTV? A complete non-starter
steven605   1/26/2011 11:52:29 AM
NO RATINGS
I come from China, just read the two «Avatar»of 3D version and «Pirates of the Dream Space». I am looking forward to the future of 3D! ___________ http://www.hdvideoconverter-mac.com

Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week