Breaking News
Blog

What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
BrainiacV
User Rank
Rookie
re: What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us
BrainiacV   2/17/2011 9:35:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Computers are never going to mimic the human brain, anymore than airplanes mimic birds. Birds and planes fly, but they do so by different methods, and so it will be when we have computers doing human tasks.

dirk.bruere
User Rank
Rookie
re: What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us
dirk.bruere   2/17/2011 8:35:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Moore's Law has several decades to go before we see cheap computers that rival the Human brain in processing power. I think it naive to expect Human level performance from any system still orders of magnitude away from Human. OTOH, we are probably getting a preview of Google 2.0

DigySol
User Rank
Rookie
re: What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us
DigySol   2/17/2011 8:32:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Bill, You missed the point of Watson all together. No one in the Watson team will say that "we are replacing the brain" and knows that this is just the first step in a (very) long journey. Rather, it opened the door on a brand new chapter in human-machine interaction and the ability of the computer to absorb and use information. The real point in artificial intelligence is to pursue an understanding of the ultimate "computing machine": us humans. And, though we may not achieve the ultimate, we learn a lot about novel ways to use automation and radically improve our lives. The real payoff is a better world for us humans.

sleibson
User Rank
Rookie
re: What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us
sleibson   2/17/2011 7:05:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Watson's use of 2880 processors and immense amount of storage to mimic just one part of what the human brain does is a testament to the design of the brain because it gives us another look at the scale of complexity needed to master the Jeopardy! problem. Watson isn't designed to drive, so it only emulates part of what we do, while requiring orders of magnitude more power to do it. Next time you read about the latest "powerful" computer, you have permission to snort milk through your nose.

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us
Brian Fuller2   2/17/2011 4:35:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Ray Kurweil offers his take in the Wall Street Journal today, riffing on his "Singularity" work. Bottom line from his perch is machines won't take over; we'll harness them effectively. We shall see. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704409004576146542688952206.html

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: What the IBM WatsonóJeopardy matchup really tells us
Brian Fuller2   2/17/2011 4:30:36 PM
NO RATINGS
And why, Bill, do we pick up the phone to call someone, they answer, and then we've completely forget why we wanted to call? Disk-access error, methinks. Or age. Great post!

<<   <   Page 4 / 4
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
How to Cope with a Burpy Comet
October 17, 2pm EDT Friday
EE Times Editorial Director Karen Field interviews Andrea Accomazzo, Flight Director for the Rosetta Spacecraft.