REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Blog

Why I ignore most "extrapolations"

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Carlos1966
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Carlos1966   4/21/2011 2:43:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Dragons, I see you don't believe in the law of the excluded middle.:-)

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Peter Clarke   4/18/2011 9:19:04 AM
NO RATINGS
But not to do statistics!

HereBeDragons
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
HereBeDragons   4/18/2011 4:21:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Statistics can prove anything: About 30% of traffic accidents are caused by drunk drivers. Therefore 60% of accidents are caused by sober drivers. Therefore it's safer to drive drunk than sober!!!

M. Oza
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
M. Oza   4/14/2011 1:55:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello Jeff; Mathematically, you just summed up the entire article by Bill Schweber with three equations.

Jeff.Petro
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Jeff.Petro   4/11/2011 2:43:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Take the fraction 0/0 (zero over zero). Using extrapolation this is equal to 0, 1 or infinity. 0/3 = 0/2 = 0/1 = 0 therefore 0/0 = 0 3/3 = 2/2 = 1/1 = 1 therefore 0/0 = 1 3/0 = 2/0 = 1/0 = infinity therefore 0/0 = infinity With the ability to skew the numbers like this, I think I missed my calling as a marketer (or politician)

David Ashton
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
David Ashton   4/3/2011 9:49:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Who was it who said "There are Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics"? (Just googled, Mark Twain popularised it but attributed it to Benjamin Disraeli, but that's doubtful....) Very applicable here though, bad statistics and bad extrapolations are closely related. At this rate, nothing we read in a couple of years time will be able to be believed.... :-)

ndancer
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
ndancer   3/31/2011 8:30:44 PM
NO RATINGS
At this rate, statistically inaccuracies will totally overwhelm us and swamp us fifty feet deep under discarded AOL CD's in less that twenty-leben years!

fajita
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
fajita   3/31/2011 4:16:39 PM
NO RATINGS
i love that innumeracy book! i've been using that on all my Lit Major friends for decades! i agree with this article thoroughly, but i do want to make sure we remember the miracle of quasi-math laws: moore's law. that thing is the one and only legitimate one, and it's been in effect for nearly 40 years, though we may be finally coming to the end of it (how many times has that been said about moore's law??).

Rick Nelson
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Rick Nelson   3/31/2011 3:02:17 PM
NO RATINGS
What quasi-mathematical statements turn me off? Predictions about lost productivity (usually in the $millions or $billions) because of some sporting or other event that will distract workers.

Silicon_Smith
User Rank
Author
re: Why I ignore most "extrapolations"
Silicon_Smith   3/31/2011 2:27:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Thats why we have supercomputers calculating system dynamics for critical projects like nuclear energy, space vehicles and global economy. No trending there.

More Blogs
Apple has identified who its toughest foe is and is taking action.
A few technologies are reaching a level of maturity that will likely change the way we work, the way we innovate, the way we make, and the way we run the factories and supply chains that we operate.
Every function and activity in manufacturing has data behind it that should be leveraged to improve processes across the organization that will help it achieve smart factory status.
Do we need a group to certify that IoT products support some baseline security and privacy standards? If so, what are the standards and who is the group?
What makes Taiwan’s foray into cars interesting is if and when Foxconn gets involved. We spotted several key technologies at AutoTronics show last week.
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed