Breaking News
Blog

In search of best-in-class R&D organizations

Ron Collett
4/13/2011 04:09 PM EDT

 4 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
RCollett
User Rank
Rookie
re: In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
RCollett   5/10/2011 1:56:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely correct -- application of the Best-in-Class paradigm requires comparison of similar kinds of products.

Test_engineer
User Rank
Rookie
re: In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
Test_engineer   4/29/2011 1:25:11 PM
NO RATINGS
It ain't Research in Motion (RIM). This outfit is going the way of my former employer, Nortel Networks; namely, down the tubes. Canada should stay away from high tech industries and concentrate on their competitive advantages in producing hockey players and stand-up comedians.

cdhmanning
User Rank
Rookie
re: In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
cdhmanning   4/27/2011 9:30:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Or, with slightly different terminology, efficiency vs effectiveness, I don't know that you can really make useful comparisons. There is far too much variance between different companies and even between different teams in those companies. For example, how do you compare a team developing an automotive chip (high reliability, high temperatures,...) to one developing a consumer chip (fast, low power). The first team have a lot more emphasis on testing and verification and need to move conservatively but the second group just need to get the next gen chip out there fast.

FastDev
User Rank
Rookie
re: In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
FastDev   4/27/2011 12:36:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Great analysis of the difficulties of measuring R&D productivity. The challenge is getting easier, however, with the advent of new toolsets and methodologies, that fundamentally change the way organizations conduct R&D. We've seen customers using a combinatorial R&D approach achieve results in weeks that would have taken months or years with traditional methods. The resulting improvement in efficiency enables project timelines to be met or pulled in without assigning additional staff. While this doesn't provide a direct mechanism for benchmarking against competitors, it does allow you to measure internal progress, both in terms of cost and ultimate success in bringing new technologies to the market. John Behnke VP WW Sales and Marketing Intermolecular

More Blogs
The ways we express units of measurement should be perfectly clear, but they aren't.
Nvidia’s Maxwell, its new high-end graphics processor, opens up a door to real-time voxel processing, an enhanced method of lighting, says veteran analyst Jon Peddie.
ARM TechCon is only a few weeks away, and if you're doing any ARM-related development it will be the place to be to expand your knowledge and skills.
Wearables should be as unique as the person who wears them. The NEX Band is a modular wearable device that changes its look and functionality based on the charms selected by the user.
Take a stroll down wearable memory lane in this great inforgraphic from Mashable.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.