Breaking News

Panel prescribes Rx for Toyota

Rick DeMeis
5/24/2011 03:02 PM EDT

 1 comments   post a comment
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: Panel prescribes Rx for Toyota
cdhmanning   5/27/2011 1:15:20 AM
Does the Aerospace industry really have a better track record than Toyota? Would a better "balance" provide better safety? The only way that is going to work would be so shift the controls development and/or testing from Japan to USA. Do US companies really have a significantly better track record that Toyota - enough to make a difference? To me, the whole thing just looks like bluster. There are no proven problems, but the lawyers want to sue Toyota and the only way they can do that is to show negligent engineering practices. Toyota has to respond so get panels of experts together to plan a new way forward. Now even if quality does not get materially changed, at least Toyota can say they did everything possible and are thus not negligent. [My note: could this article be partly attributed to a US cultural trait of feelings of gross superiority to anyone else].

Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
Like Us on Facebook Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll