Breaking News
Blog

Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Steve Bible
User Rank
Blogger
re: Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)
Steve Bible   8/22/2011 6:29:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello Sanjib, no special protection was given to the electronics. However, we did put in redundancy and monitoring so that the subsystems will continue to operate if they detected a failure. We shall see during the life of ARISSat-1 how well it performs in Low-Earth Orbit radiation environment. On the battery choice, please see my replies above. Glad you like the blog!

Steve Bible
User Rank
Blogger
re: Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)
Steve Bible   8/22/2011 6:26:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi SQ2AHR, thank you! It really wasn't a political decision. In the beginning ARISSat-1 was to be SuitSat-2. We would get the suit and its battery. Thus we always planned from the beginning to use the Orlan suit battery.

Steve Bible
User Rank
Blogger
re: Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)
Steve Bible   8/22/2011 6:23:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi David, the battery is what we were given for the project. We did expect it to live a little bit longer than it did. But we did learn! So we are discussing options for the next ARISSat such as NiCd with supercaps. It will be experimental so we can learn from it. It will also have to meet all safety requirements.

Sanjib.A
User Rank
CEO
re: Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)
Sanjib.A   8/22/2011 3:58:40 PM
NO RATINGS
Steve, thanks a lot for sharing the information. I'm curious to know what measures are taken to protect the electronics from harsh conditions in space, which are not usually needed on earth. Again, I am also wondering why you did not do something better than using that battery. Great article! will look forward for the next parts.

mac_droz
User Rank
Rookie
re: Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)
mac_droz   8/22/2011 8:21:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Great article! I'm following it as well as the project website. There's just one think I don't understand: Why on Earth did you pick the battery with a maximum lifespan of 5 cycles and unknown characteristics in the temperature range that you are going to use? I understand all about the safety (there are good articles in the technical section on the project website), but this seems almost like a political decision. Any off the shelf battery from supermarket would do a better job it seems. Anyway I enjoy reading! 73 de sq2ahr

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: Chips in Space: Letís look inside ARISSat-1 (part 2)
David Ashton   8/22/2011 8:07:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Steve, could you not have used a battery with a better projected lifespan? Or were you stuck with this one? How would you do it better next time?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week