Breaking News
Blog

What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
JDeere
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
JDeere   1/4/2012 3:25:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Several years ago I purchased a tool for maintaining strings of lights that contains this device along with a bulb tester and failed lamp detector. It is made of red and green plastic and has been sold for at least five years at walgreen's and WalMart. Perhaps that's why it the patent application was rejected, as it should have been. Brian Bailey should be more diligent in his research.

BobZ01
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
BobZ01   12/25/2011 2:43:03 AM
NO RATINGS
This patent has not been issued. In fact it was given a rejection on September 15, 2011. It is application 11/789,450. January 6, 2011 is the publication date not the issue date.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
phoenixdave   12/24/2011 2:32:00 PM
NO RATINGS
@zeeglen: You may be on to something revolutionary!

zeeglen
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
zeeglen   12/23/2011 10:01:36 PM
NO RATINGS
More prior art - my string winder (a crank to turn guitar tuning machines rapidly) has a similar U shaped slot for prying string retention pegs out of their holes behind the bridge. But recently I found the slot was worn out and the pegs had been in place for so long they would not budge. Did not want to use pliers, they would deface the plastic ball knobs on the tops of the pegs. But I found a neat gadget that did the job superbly and now I think I will patent it as a "Peg Puller". The gadget is an 8 inch long steel rod with a wood handle at one end and is split into 2 flat ridged tines at the other. With a little bit of pressure these tines slipped around and gripped the retention pegs perfectly, slight leverage easily pried them loose. I found this gadget in the kitchen drawer. But I don't think I will tell the patent examiner that it is really a Fondue Fork...

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
old account Frank Eory   12/23/2011 5:47:22 PM
NO RATINGS
The Patent Clerk that approved it most likely has a quota of something like 100 applications a week to review, and the pile of new applications gets bigger before it ever gets smaller. The attitude at the USPTO seems to be, for quite some years now, to approve anything that can't immediately be rejected by a quick prior art search, and just let them all fight it out in court.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
phoenixdave   12/23/2011 12:48:00 PM
NO RATINGS
@Brian...Do you have the patent number for this? Can't seem to find it....

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
eewiz   12/23/2011 8:39:18 AM
NO RATINGS
these are patents taken, just for the sake of claiming "patented technology inside". The "inventor" wont be able to defend such patents in court, in case of an infringement/trial.

klsxgo90
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
klsxgo90   12/23/2011 12:51:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course it's obvious and there is prior art. Look at the back end of a hammer, (the nail remover "U"). Prior art and obvious use. The Patent Clerk that approved this should be fired for being lazy in not researching prior art well. I bet the nail remover end of the hammer could even be used to remove the bulb, thereby rendering this patented item worthless in the marketplace, as anyone could just use their hammer to pull out the old light bulbs.

phoenixdave
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
phoenixdave   12/22/2011 9:35:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Sometimes the simplest inventions turn out to be the most revolutionary inventions. Q-tip, toothbrush, aglet, others?

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Patenting the obvious?
old account Frank Eory   12/22/2011 7:31:41 PM
NO RATINGS
At least that guy came up with something that would actually work (it's not another perpetual motion machine) and which some people might find useful. Years ago, a former manager of mine joked about the idea of writing a software tool called PatentCAD, which would automate the process of creating new patents out of old ones, with almost no thought or interaction required by the user. You can imagine something like this: private decimal PatentValue() { Patent newPatent; foreach (Patent oldPatent in PatentOffice.Patents) { newPatent = oldPatent.Clone(); //here is the inovative part!!!!!! newPatent.Text += " with a computer."; newPatent.Submit(); } return decimal.MaxValue; } You could imagine many other phrases that could substitute for "with a computer". Too bad he never wrote PatentCAD. He could've made a fortune simply by tweaking old patents with the new innovative add-on phrase, or by combining 2 or more patents plus the particular innovative add-on phrase "integrated into a single microcircuit."

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed