Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
NitroWare.net
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
NitroWare.net   7/23/2012 8:58:24 PM
NO RATINGS
The dark horse in this is AMD and Global Foundries What are they doing - arn't they doing a process change for some of their products going foward? AMD licensed the ARM as a security co-processor not sure if that is or needs to be 64bit.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/23/2012 9:33:37 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd watch out for Samsung, they would definitely see this opportunity.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/23/2012 10:08:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Let's remember wrapping the gate around silicon is an extra barrier to shrinking.

HS_SemiPro
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
HS_SemiPro   7/24/2012 6:33:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Foundry has to make a technology available that can be suitable for all kinds of IP and design types. Intel has advantage of knowing what they are developing the technology for. Technology and design co-optimization. Same reason why IBM is still developing its own technology for its server chips.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
KB3001   7/24/2012 5:04:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel and its acolytes are still trying the same old tricks: selling their products on features rather than benefits! Yesteryear, the name of the game was the processor clock speed, now it's FinFET :-) but the world has changed and consumers won't be conned again. There is more to product success these days than just the transistor/process technology (Ha!)...

askubel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
askubel   7/24/2012 7:09:40 PM
NO RATINGS
You mean benefits like 30% less power consumption on average vs 32nm? I for one, applaud Intel for marketing the technology behind these benefits rather than just telling consumers "It's faster, so buy it"

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
KB3001   7/24/2012 8:57:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, but what about the overall system performance, power consumption, battery life, software and hardware eco-system? Neaaahh, who cares, it's FinFET technology after all :-)

vdara
User Rank
Rookie
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
vdara   7/25/2012 12:50:18 AM
NO RATINGS
So, why do ARM and TSMC bother to announce that they have FinFET in the roadmap? Since nobody cares it anyway.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/25/2012 1:03:52 AM
NO RATINGS
The Ivy Bridge advantage over Sandy Bridge is not 100% clear: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-overclocking-core-i7-3770k,3198-5.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-overclocking-core-i7-3770k,3198-3.html

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/25/2012 1:08:40 AM
NO RATINGS
About TSMC or foundries in general, they will never adopt new technologies unless it is clear customers will go for it. That is why they are not so "self-driven" as Intel or Samsung might be. That is why you need ARM or Qualcomm to first sign up. Even then, there is general reluctance. What if it is just one customer? Should other customers benefit so easily without putting in so much develop time? Etc.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
EE Times Senior Technical Editor Martin Rowe will interview EMC engineer Kenneth Wyatt.
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll