Breaking News
Blog

Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dblaza1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
dblaza1   8/26/2012 6:29:13 PM
NO RATINGS
These kind of polls can be controversial but the benefit to EETimes.com readers is the editors are looking at this data every day and get to interview the CEO's of major companies so they have a perspective on the industry that even the Wall Street Journal doesn't. If one of your suppliers has closed a fab, is losing money or has had management turnover wouldn't you like to know?

Navelpluis
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Navelpluis   8/24/2012 6:08:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Craig, you have a good point here, but I doubt it. Fortunately most engineers are bright in their thoughts and decisions: 1) Comparing NxP with Qualcomm is 'apples and eggs'. These companies do not have much shared markets out there. Engineers know this more often than one might expect. But hey, name me the quantity of engineers working with Qualcomm v.s. NxP? Is it a 1:1000 ? 2) I have a strong feeling that most engineers that filled in the poll are positioned in the US.

CraigL
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
CraigL   8/21/2012 12:29:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Hasn't EE Times just contributed to the demise of these companies by conducting the poll... surely designers who read this are going to avoid selecting components from those companies not expected to be around in a few years time, especially if those designers work on products with long life cycles?

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
t.alex   8/19/2012 3:29:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with the thumbs down results, but it would not be so soon before they go out of business.

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Brian Fuller2   8/17/2012 3:25:17 AM
NO RATINGS
For @krh and @Robotics Developer: help us refine the methodology. Perhaps the core question is not "which companies will be around" but something designed to assess your confidence level in various suppliers (not unlike consumer confidence surveys). Or maybe it's a rating system that gauges your experience in 4-5 areas (returns, tech service, product breadth etc.). Again, I'm trying to strike a balance between yielding a relevant, sound confidence report and not forcing readers to spend 30 minutes checking off boxes on the form. Your input (as was the case for last year's quality survey) will be HUGE!

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Robotics Developer   8/17/2012 12:37:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I would think that EE Times readership would be a good place as any to take the pulse of the marketplace. I am not sure that we the readers can predict with great certainty whether a company will or will not be around in 5 years, but perceptions are very important. Would you design in a device from a company that you felt was not going to be around for long?

krh
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
krh   8/16/2012 1:44:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Please define what is meant by "foreign IC suppliers". This seems like a swimsuit competition, with a hard qualifier to know what they will look like in 5 years. Seriously, what are the qualifications for the judges...???

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Brian Fuller2   8/15/2012 5:25:04 PM
NO RATINGS
We're thinking of institutionalizing this as a regular engineer-confidence poll.... any thoughts on how to cast a wider company net without making the survey too burdensome for readers?

More Blogs
Thanks to 3D imaging software and a special milling machine, dentists can create and install caps in a single visit. That's got to be worth a toothy smile.
It's the law of unintended consequences again, as regulations to reduce energy consumption by reducing power ratings may actually have the opposite effect.
3D-printed car has successful test drive!
EETimes is pleased to announce that Gadi Amit will be a keynote speaker at the Designer of Things conference. Gadi shares his passion for bucking technology trends and implementing beautiful design through international talks.
An engineer discovers amazing schematics and documentation pasted to the back of a 92-year-old organ originally installed in a San Francisco vaudeville house.
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll