Breaking News
Blog

Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dblaza1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
dblaza1   8/26/2012 6:29:13 PM
NO RATINGS
These kind of polls can be controversial but the benefit to EETimes.com readers is the editors are looking at this data every day and get to interview the CEO's of major companies so they have a perspective on the industry that even the Wall Street Journal doesn't. If one of your suppliers has closed a fab, is losing money or has had management turnover wouldn't you like to know?

Navelpluis
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Navelpluis   8/24/2012 6:08:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Craig, you have a good point here, but I doubt it. Fortunately most engineers are bright in their thoughts and decisions: 1) Comparing NxP with Qualcomm is 'apples and eggs'. These companies do not have much shared markets out there. Engineers know this more often than one might expect. But hey, name me the quantity of engineers working with Qualcomm v.s. NxP? Is it a 1:1000 ? 2) I have a strong feeling that most engineers that filled in the poll are positioned in the US.

CraigL
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
CraigL   8/21/2012 12:29:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Hasn't EE Times just contributed to the demise of these companies by conducting the poll... surely designers who read this are going to avoid selecting components from those companies not expected to be around in a few years time, especially if those designers work on products with long life cycles?

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
t.alex   8/19/2012 3:29:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with the thumbs down results, but it would not be so soon before they go out of business.

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Brian Fuller2   8/17/2012 3:25:17 AM
NO RATINGS
For @krh and @Robotics Developer: help us refine the methodology. Perhaps the core question is not "which companies will be around" but something designed to assess your confidence level in various suppliers (not unlike consumer confidence surveys). Or maybe it's a rating system that gauges your experience in 4-5 areas (returns, tech service, product breadth etc.). Again, I'm trying to strike a balance between yielding a relevant, sound confidence report and not forcing readers to spend 30 minutes checking off boxes on the form. Your input (as was the case for last year's quality survey) will be HUGE!

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Robotics Developer   8/17/2012 12:37:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I would think that EE Times readership would be a good place as any to take the pulse of the marketplace. I am not sure that we the readers can predict with great certainty whether a company will or will not be around in 5 years, but perceptions are very important. Would you design in a device from a company that you felt was not going to be around for long?

krh
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
krh   8/16/2012 1:44:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Please define what is meant by "foreign IC suppliers". This seems like a swimsuit competition, with a hard qualifier to know what they will look like in 5 years. Seriously, what are the qualifications for the judges...???

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Rookie
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Brian Fuller2   8/15/2012 5:25:04 PM
NO RATINGS
We're thinking of institutionalizing this as a regular engineer-confidence poll.... any thoughts on how to cast a wider company net without making the survey too burdensome for readers?

More Blogs
The Arduino WiFi Shield 101 is designed to enable rapid prototyping of IoT applications on the Arduino platform.
Do you need to take your signals to the next level? What techniques do you use?
The state of the art has progressed spectacularly since early forays into FPGA-based prototyping, but there are still challenges to be overcome.
IoT companies need to provide a positive user experience that drives value, which is exactly the focus for home automation and business monitoring company GridConnect.
The ways we express units of measurement should be perfectly clear, but they aren't.
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.