Breaking News
Blog

Big brother Wi-Fi

Blog
8/20/2012 11:51 PM EDT

 5 comments   post a comment
NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
GordonScott
User Rank
Manager
re: Big brother Wi-Fi
GordonScott   8/22/2012 7:56:08 AM
NO RATINGS
: And maybe thatís the basic human right we are talking about here. Clearly we come from different planets.

Bob985
User Rank
Rookie
re: Big brother Wi-Fi
Bob985   8/22/2012 5:19:41 PM
NO RATINGS
: And maybe thatís the basic human right we are talking about here. Customer right perhaps, but certainly not a human right. One of the things that seems to have precipitated the assault on human rights in our times is the trivialization of that concept to mean everything and thus depriving it of meaning. The concept of human rights has changed from being intrinsic and something to be safeguarded by governments (see the Declaration of Independence) to privileges dispensed by the government to certain segments of the population for political purposes. But perhaps what's needed for the Wi-Fi offload question is a GPS type user choice of whether to select the "road with the least traffic" or not as desired. The user paying the bill should have the choice; it should not be dictated by the carrier.

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: Big brother Wi-Fi
chanj0   8/23/2012 6:56:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The question comes down to who wants control. Operators want to maximize their profit while consumers want to maximize their bandwidth and to reduce their cost. Security is one big push from consumers that operators are leveraging to convince consumers to pay. Google WiFi in mountain view is free for open access. If you look into better bandwidth and security, you will have to pay. Regulatory division of most governments requires operators to be able to monitor telephone conversation for homeland security reason. I am sure similar regulation applies to ISP. In addition, the world has changed drastically. A lot of new generation are volunteering information. Do we really have security concerns here? Of course there is. The best option to us will be using tunneling protocol and encryption to protect our conversation. What would you do?

I_B_GREEN
User Rank
Rookie
re: Big brother Wi-Fi
I_B_GREEN   8/23/2012 9:27:29 PM
NO RATINGS
They can't have it boh ways. Either offer smartphnes without the monthly fee and alow people to only use WiFi. Or prorate the servce based on QOS. But we as consumers would need legal based (think new law) QOS metrics to keep them honest.

I_B_GREEN
User Rank
Rookie
re: Big brother Wi-Fi
I_B_GREEN   8/23/2012 9:29:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Ijust want the right to ofload the sevice fee. I can live with just WiFi. A daily fee for using the data nework could be a good ompromise when you just have to ue it or for convience.

Navigate to Related Links
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for todayís commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll