Breaking News
Blog

Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 10 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Bellhop
User Rank
Author
re: Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages
Bellhop   10/9/2012 8:02:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Very clever, Brian! You spread it out over ten pages so that you could get ten page-view clicks from each reader!

kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc
User Rank
Author
re: Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages
kjdsfkjdshfkdshfvc   10/9/2012 5:37:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I know I'm getting old, but when I learned drafting, that pointy thing was called a compass, not a protractor.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages
BrianBailey   10/9/2012 4:55:05 PM
NO RATINGS
We all need distractions from our working life at times and some of these things from our past are fun.

ccalvin
User Rank
Author
re: Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages
ccalvin   10/8/2012 7:04:14 PM
NO RATINGS
I remember reading about Flexigons in SciAm while in Jr. High School. And colored the faces, concealed messages, etc. The mma.org link is interesting as Bryant Tuckerman, Richard Feynman, and John Tukey are mentioned on page 3 as some who worked with flexigons.

alaki
User Rank
Author
re: Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages
alaki   10/5/2012 4:56:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Seems someone running out of ideas! :)

GeoffJ
User Rank
Author
re: Using HexaFlexagons to pass secret messages
GeoffJ   10/4/2012 4:59:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Or you could watch this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIVIegSt81k This video is based on, and in honor of, Martin Gardner's first Mathematical Games column from 1956, "Hexaflexagons," which can be found here: http://maa.org/pubs/focus/Gardner_Hexaflexagons12_1956.pdf

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed