SAN JOSE, Calif.--The U.S. "fiscal cliff" negotiations should be
resolved within two weeks and entitlement reform addressed by
mid-2013, freeing legislators to reform the big technology-workforce
elephant in the room, immigration, a Washington lobbyist said this
Frank Kelly, head of communications and public affairs for the
Americas for Deutsche Bank, told an audience of industry executives
Thursday night (Nov. 29) that the political rancor in Washington is
muted right now, a promising sign for compromise.
"All these people have to get along. All these people have to not
insult each other too much. I think what you're seeing is the
insults are at minimum. That's an important thing to watch," Kelly
pictured right) said during the annual SIA awards dinner here at the Fairmont Hotel.
In recent days, various Republicans in Congress--though not in
leadership roles--are signalling willingness to compromise on taxes.
"That's giving comfort and encouragement to the speaker of the House
to come to that position and he will come to that position," Kelly said.
"I think you'll see a Bush tax cut extended six months to a year,
but the president's laid down a marker: everyone gets the extension
except millionaires," Kelly said.
Kelly said he expects a deal in the next 10-14 days, although "it's
going to be very ugly." If that timing fails, he expects a "bungee
jump" effect: "There's no deal before Christmas and then markets
tank; they all run back and between Christmas and New Year and they
get the deal," he said.
"You'll see taxes go up on the wealthy, you'll see the question
(resolved) of what happens to those between $250,000 and a million
(dollars)--that still has to be hammered out--and entitlements will
be on the table," Kelly said.
"Washington is sick of dealing with this. They want to move on;
Republicans want to move on … they understand there's a roadblock
and they are the roadblock," Kelly said.
They want to move on, in part, to tackle immigration reform.
Already, since the presidential election, three Republican
immigration-reform bills have been introduced into Congress, partly
because the GOP understands the its stance on immigration hurt the
party in the election.
"I moderated a panel with George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. It was
like interviewing Cheech and Chong. A huge portion of that
discussion--on their own--was immigration," and Bush and Clinton
were "finishing each other's sentences" on the topic, Kelly said.
"They talked about the importance of H-1B visas, to which Bill
Clinton pointed out--and you guys know--for every H1b visa, six new
jobs are created," he added.
… they understand there's a roadblock and they are the roadblock,"
That's why we voted for them. And that's all they need to understand.
Besides, I hate this language. The word "roadblock" infers an impediment to forward motion. The Republican constituency does not consider higher taxes, stifling regulation and greater dependence on statists to be forward motion. Just the opposite, and rightfully so.
It is true however that the Republican establishment in Washington sees immigration as a major reason they lost. And they will no doubt waste their time and future political capital chasing it down.
I would caution against that assertion though. A study by some Manhattan Institute muckity-muck concluded that 75% of Hispanics vote D for the same reasons that a whole lot of other D-voters vote D. Only 25% saw immigration as the key.
But doesn't that relly confuse the issue as it pertains to the technology labor market? As it pertains to us? Are we really seeing a massive influx of South Americans in technology, or pressure thereof?
"I moderated a panel with George W. Bush and Bill Clinton...yadda, yadda..."finishing each other's sentences"..yadda, yadda.
So this certainly adds to the “the-fix-is-in” argument but more curious is what your average out-of-work American software engineer has to say about this:
..."for every H1b visa, six new jobs are created."
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.