Breaking News
Blog

What were they thinking: Christmas patents

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
JefW
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
JefW   12/21/2012 10:18:46 AM
NO RATINGS
I thought you were joking - but no; I found a patent for "Method of swinging on a swing". http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22method+swinging+swing%22&OS=

does1230
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
does1230   12/20/2012 7:53:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Our products are developed using superior quality basic material, which are ensure their optimum performance at the clients' end for longer period of time. Because of that we are the most trusted, reliable and eminent manufacturers[url=http://www.drivesautomation.com/ac-drives.html]a1000[/url],[url=http://www.drivesautomation.com/ac-drives.html]v1000[/url]and [url=http://www.drivesautomation.com/ac-motor.html]ac motor[/url], suppliers and exporters of Industrial Products from the last 20 years. We build trust not only in india but also in Egypt, Bangladesh, Srilanka, Kenya, Koonkola and growing throughout the world. we are specialized in offering[url=http://www.drivesautomation.com/ac-drives.html]a1000[/url],[url=http://www.drivesautomation.com/ac-drives.html]v1000[/url]and [url=http://www.drivesautomation.com/ac-motor.html]ac motor[/url].

electrofun
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
electrofun   12/19/2012 2:25:57 PM
NO RATINGS
I realized that the USPTO had jumped the tracks when I saw a patent for "a method of swinging a swing."

ChrisJ555
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
ChrisJ555   12/17/2012 5:02:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Ha - I used something suspiciously like Fig. #5 years ago to water, er, well, fill an inaccessible brake fluid reservoir... got a funnel and a piece of tubing and went to it (no level monitoring though).

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
BrianBailey   12/17/2012 3:41:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I think even better, the patent officer that accepted the last frivolous patent!

BrianBailey
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
BrianBailey   12/17/2012 3:40:36 PM
NO RATINGS
This was patented THIS year, meaning NO ONE has ever had this idea before (according to the patent office)!

bogdanbmcc
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
bogdanbmcc   12/17/2012 3:27:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe there should stocks before the USPO where they could keep always one of the last frivolous patent filers

jjgray
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
jjgray   12/17/2012 10:09:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Well I am hoping the watering funnel is not a granted patent, but Larry is right: it is certainly the right balance of effectiveness v simplicity. About 30 years ago I made something similar for emptying buckets of water out of my parents' leaky attic and it still works. My 'funnel' was a cut-off plastic Coke bottle.

larussell
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
larussell   12/16/2012 11:34:59 PM
NO RATINGS
I have #5. It is the best solution for watering trees I have ever had. It also has a long pipette that slides down inside the watering tube to check how much water is in the stand. I've seen all kinds of complicated solutions to this problem including pumps with level monitoring, and siphons with remote filling tanks, etc., but sometimes the simple solution involving a bit of plastic is the best. This kind of innovation is why the patent system was created.

Battar
User Rank
Author
re: What were they thinking: Christmas patents
Battar   12/16/2012 7:02:35 AM
NO RATINGS
You would be surprised - and saddened - to see how much "unpatentable" rubbish gets past the patent examiners and converted into patents.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed