Breaking News
Blog

What were they thinking: Crazy method patent

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
DrQuine   2/18/2013 3:20:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, when I received my 40th patent, a friend cited this swing patent as an example of the fact that patents can be trivial. In this case, the kid who invented it may have thought he invented something new - and the examiner must have been enough of a geek never to have played on a swing and discovered the prior art himself. Nevertheless, as eng_steve observed, the patent was quickly reversed. It is unfortunate that the patent reversal appears as the final page of the patent so the casual reader may miss it. Maybe overturned patents need a big "X" across the first page.

Tom_nickname
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
Tom_nickname   1/31/2013 11:17:59 PM
NO RATINGS
The patent office were thinking "if this idiot wants to give us a few thousand dollars to get a completely useless patent why should we think for more than 10 seconds before taking his money?"

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
BrianBailey   1/28/2013 8:12:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Good to hear it. Thanks for letting us know.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
BrianBailey   1/28/2013 8:12:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Ahhh. Done that one. Would have to find patent. It was for a revolving cone that would allow certyain lick patterns to be made in the ice cream!

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
Garcia-Lasheras   1/28/2013 6:05:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I completely agree. And the point is that the author get it... just as Brian is widely acomplishing this goal too with the last "what were they thinkink" patent related post series!!

eng_steve
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
eng_steve   1/28/2013 5:11:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Good news. This patent was reexamined in 2003 and all claims were cancelled.

GordonScott
User Rank
Manager
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
GordonScott   1/28/2013 4:30:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Fortunately it's a fairly weak patent that doesn't outlaw Lissajous patterns or strange attractors. I presume what the author was thinking was to demonstrate how silly the system can get. The Patent Office alone know what they were thinking (if anything). Next patent "method for licking an ice cream"

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
David Ashton   1/26/2013 10:21:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Better just shoot them first (before Obama's gun control laws take effect....) :-)

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
BrianBailey   1/26/2013 6:55:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Ah yes - I wonder how many politicians and even presidents have fallen foul of the law on these! We should ask them before letting them take office!!

Garcia-Lasheras
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Crazy method patent
Garcia-Lasheras   1/26/2013 10:11:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Uff!!... So if you are eating a crustless sandwich while swinging in a swing, you can really get in serious trouble. Thousands of children around the world are incurring in this double patent infringement, somebody should advice them before being too late!!

Most Recent Comments
Clive
 
betajet
 
sranje
 
goafrit
 
jautor770
 
rick merritt
 
Armourcard
 
Steve Manley
 
rick merritt
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week