Breaking News
Blog

Be a reality star—apply for extreme engineering show

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dneves0
User Rank
Author
re: Be a reality star—apply for extreme engineering show
dneves0   2/22/2013 9:50:00 AM
NO RATINGS
The reason these shows are called reality shows is that they are somewhat based on reality even if they are dramatized (i.e. exaggerated). All the points you mention are not too far of the kinds of things you would encounter in any given technology company, or any other kind of human endeavor for that matter. I still find it positive to let other (non technical) people know what happens inside a tech company even if it is a tad colored for the sake of the show. Of course in the end the kind of "coloring" done on the view that people have on the engineering class is also important and I would't appreciate very much if it made us look weird/bad/whatever. But the current view is not that positive so it can't get much worse. (Although it is always a possibility!)

IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc
User Rank
Author
re: Be a reality star—apply for extreme engineering show
IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc   2/21/2013 8:57:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Engineering Wars? I really have to laugh when they say it's unscripted. I've spent a number of years in television and 'unscripted' is a synonym for 'yawning'. The general premise is scripted, the characters are pre-determined based on personality and their ability to conflict with others. In other words, can they create drama so the viewers remain entertained. The premise of these shows is cookie cutter with different locations, props and people. The show will contain: - human conflict - impending deadlines - emphasis on random failures - highlighting opposing views - a splinter group to provide competition - tugging at our heartstrings with an over the top glorification of patriotism - the old boys vs the young guns Did I just describe the new show? Or have I just regurgitated the plots of every reality show before it? I really hope this doesn't get picked up by the networks because it would be a terrible embarrassment to have Skilled Engineers held in the same light as the Real Housewives of Timbuktu.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed