Breaking News
Blog

Ultrabooks to the rescue?

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
ChipConnoisseur
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks to the rescue?
ChipConnoisseur   2/21/2013 6:27:57 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think ultrabooks will help the PC market recover. The decline will be much faster than even the slow growth ultrabooks may get. But ultrabooks will remain a niche market. Most consumers don't want $1000 devices, whether they are laptops are "tablets". And the latest stats show that with an average price of Windows PC's of only $450.

joshxdr
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks to the rescue?
joshxdr   2/21/2013 5:47:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said. I can remember thinking that it sure would be nice to view content on the internet without being perched at my desk in front of my PC. Then wireless LAN came around, and I was surfing with my bulky, noisy, hot laptop while lying in bed. Then tablets came around and they were exactly what I had been looking for all along. I still use my old PC for composing sending mail, doing taxes, and other "active" work. An ultrabook seems to be trying to fill both niches: passive consumption with the keyboard off, and active work with the keyboard on.

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks to the rescue?
DrQuine   2/21/2013 12:10:18 AM
NO RATINGS
The product price pyramid has been up-ended. No longer is there a simple continuum from big and cheap desktop computers to small and expensive laptops. SmartPhones, iPads, Ultrabooks, Notebooks and tablets have divided the market into many niches. The value proposition of a Ultrabook is no longer clear.

GQQSER2
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks to the rescue?
GQQSER2   2/20/2013 10:59:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Several factors from my point of view. 1. The advancement of software we witnessed in the past that limited a computer's efficiency has seemed to slow down to the point where PC's and laptops live much longer - why upgrade? 2. Pricing for ultrabooks when there are much cheaper brand names running Intel i5 or i7 processors that consumers are very comfortable with at the moment. 3. How robust is the mechanical interface between screen and laptop body - how many cycles before my kids break it is seriously on my mind for a $1,000 device. 4. Alternatives -$300 for a standard laptop plus a $199 tablet (let's say Google Nexus 7) and I have spent half the money for an ultrabook. 5. As Bert mentioned, many mainstream, general public consumers are looking for devices for "information consumption" in a mobile way. And why wouldn't they be - they've been conditioned for this with smart phones. Unless there is some game changing feature, I am not interested in an expensive Ultrabook, unless, of course, my employer buys me one.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: Ultrabooks to the rescue?
Bert22306   2/20/2013 8:58:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd like to see what success the Surface Pro will have. Too bad that its $900 price tag seems simply too high. Cheap(er) tablets will of course outsell more useful appliances, such as laptops and notebooks. I don't know why the trade press hasn't understood this yet. They are a different animal. Tablets are more a replacement for printed media, books, magazines, newspapers, than they are a functional replacement for notebooks or laptops. The fact that many people had no choice but to use laptops to do "information consumption" previously does not change this reality, I don't think.

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed