Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Will Moore's Law doom multicore?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
pica0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Will Moore's Law doom multicore?
pica0   3/12/2013 2:11:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Many application used all day contain a damn lot of tasks that can be performed in parallel. Just take an editor frame as example: rendering, spell check and syntax or grammar check can be performed in seperate threads. The fact most application are designed with a single core in mind does not imply, the application does nit contain paralellism.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Will Moore's Law doom multicore?
Bert22306   3/11/2013 8:19:47 PM
NO RATINGS
"Amdahl's Law tells us that even with an infinite number of cores, an application that is 50% parallelizable will get only a 2x speedup over a single-core design." The key words are "an application." There are often multiple applications vying for CPU cycles, all running at the same time. So in fact, I can show how a quad-core processor shows up as only 25 percent busy, or slightly more than that, when the same app running on a single core eats up 100 percent of CPU cycles. I've read, though, that memory buses of today show no improvement beyond what you can eek out of an 8-core processor. The problem being choreography, in essence.

Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week