Breaking News
Blog

London Calling: Sir Robin Saxby's startup rules

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Threaded | Newest First | Oldest First
chipmonk0
User Rank
CEO
re: London Calling: Sir Robin Saxby's startup rules
chipmonk0   3/21/2013 4:57:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Are other British Companies following ARM's recipe for success ?

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: London Calling: Sir Robin Saxby's startup rules
Peter Clarke   3/21/2013 5:23:34 PM
NO RATINGS
@chipmonk Probably some are trying to follow a similar set of guidelines but none in the technology sector have achieved as much success as ARM. The 10th bullet point would probably be "Have some luck"

chanj0
User Rank
CEO
re: London Calling: Sir Robin Saxby's startup rules
chanj0   3/26/2013 6:40:55 AM
NO RATINGS
All 9 bullet points are a must to a startup. I particularly like 7th and 8th. Team works are crucial. More brains will definitely help pave a better future. Change is inevitable. I don't believe any entrepreneurs can avoid it since the market keeps changing. If there are more eyes to see and more ears to hear, a good leader might very well define the better paved road for the whole team. To Clarke, I love the 10th. Which startup can be successful w/o? ;)

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: London Calling: Sir Robin Saxby's startup rules
Peter Clarke   3/26/2013 10:08:55 AM
NO RATINGS
@chanj I cannot take the credit. At the same event Ron Reddy, a founder of the now public Peregrine Semiconductor -- and a very witty speaker -- said something along the lines of "It is the entrepreneurs' job to keep a startup alive until they get some luck."

Navelpluis
User Rank
CEO
re: London Calling: Sir Robin Saxby's startup rules
Navelpluis   3/29/2013 7:32:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Nice story, but... Investments needed are enormous these days. To startup something vital (physical results, something you can hold in your hand and not just bubbles of air) is almost an impossible thing to do. Legal issues almost always kill startups instantly as soon as some success comes out. I am very very negative about the effects of patents, and even worse, software patents. Legal issues are simply too complicated and thus horrible. On the other hand, looking at students at our university I see low entrepreneurship: Almost no one wants to startup something. But I am sure there are possibilities to pickup good ideas and to start off a good company with it (as we did ourselves with only a couple of guys) But beware... With tears in my eyes I saw SemiSouth fab equipment for sale. They had some incredible interesting products... What went wrong? Patent issues? I have no clue. But one thing is for sure: If we know more about this we might learn from it.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.