Breaking News
Blog

IPhone 5S likely evolutionary, not revolutionary

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: IPhone 5S likely evolutionary, not revolutionary
Duane Benson   3/26/2013 5:24:13 PM
NO RATINGS
"A battery that lasts all week" - Now that would be a genuine revolution. My first cell phone was a Motorola analog flip phone. I could generally get a day out of a charge. By the time I was up to a Motorola Razr flip phone, I had about a week of battery life. Now with my smart phone, I'm back to generally being able to get a day out of a charge. I do like a number of the features we get for that price, but I'd almost rather have a separate phone with a week-long battery and a smart-phone sized tablet for all of the other functionality.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: IPhone 5S likely evolutionary, not revolutionary
old account Frank Eory   3/22/2013 8:21:32 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to agree with eewiz. The first iPhone was revolutionary and every smartphone from every manufacturer since then, including Apple, has been evolutionary. Higher res screen, more megapixels in the camera, faster processor, cellular link evolution from 2.5G to 3G to LTE -- it's all very logical and predictable. That's not to say that today's phones aren't better than those of years past. They definitely are. They just don't offer any new features that truly startle the consumer. You know what might be revolutionary? A battery that lasts all week but has the same volume & weight as today's smartphone batteries.

mjlandry
User Rank
Author
re: IPhone 5S likely evolutionary, not revolutionary
mjlandry   3/22/2013 5:14:20 PM
NO RATINGS
My daughter finally got an iPhone 4 last month. I told her that I was waiting for the iPhone 7. They'll probably have it figured out by then.

Olaf.Barheine
User Rank
Author
re: IPhone 5S likely evolutionary, not revolutionary
Olaf.Barheine   3/22/2013 12:33:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder if the consumers are really ready for the next iPhone. This is a dangerous strategy of Apple.

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: IPhone 5S likely evolutionary, not revolutionary
eewiz   3/22/2013 4:52:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Only the first iphone was revolutionary, all other iphones and smartphones for that matter are just evolutionary

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed