Breaking News
Blog

Yoshida in China: What's Calxeda doing here?

NO RATINGS
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
green_is_now
User Rank
CEO
re: Yoshida in China: What's Calxeda doing here?
green_is_now   4/5/2013 3:45:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Why not a cisc/risc combo IC along the little indian big indian line of thought.

chanj0
User Rank
Manager
re: Yoshida in China: What's Calxeda doing here?
chanj0   4/2/2013 11:10:23 PM
NO RATINGS
"With Boston, the ARM-based solution (1535 servers; 1.6 racks; 2 switches; its power consumption at 13kW) can offer 40 percent lower total cost of ownership, while it can be implemented in 61 percent less space, he claimed, compared to the X86-based solution (1997 servers; 4 racks; 44 switches;37kW)." Effectively, the statement implies less space and less power consumption per server compared ARM to x86. I don't quite understand the difference of number of switches - 2 vs 44. There is a movement of 64 bits ARM server. Whether it will take over x86 based server, only time can tell. Cloud based service providers may be able to shorten the time if the risk is properly handled.

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week