Breaking News
Blog

What were they thinking: stimulus coverage

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: stimulus coverage
BrianBailey   4/16/2013 2:58:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Most of the time you will set constraints to ensure that only valid inputs are chosen by constrained random, but you can send in bad data as well to see if it is handled correctly. What I am more concerned about is that you don't actually test anything at all, you just create a false illusion that you are.

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
re: What were they thinking: stimulus coverage
jackOfManyTrades   4/16/2013 6:13:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps I have misunderstood, but isn't there a danger with what you're suggesting that you test a design to check it does what it should, but you're not checking to see that it doesn't do what it shouldn't? I can think of a couple of things that caught us out over the years where I thought - I wonder if random testing would have spotted that?

Gaurav Jalan
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: stimulus coverage
Gaurav Jalan   4/15/2013 2:06:15 AM
NO RATINGS
I have been dabbling with this approach with various mechanisms (file based/ array based etc). The scalability of this approach for larger designs and achieving cross coverage is tricky

Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
EE Times editor Junko Yoshida grills two executives --Rick Walker, senior product marketing manager for IoT and home automation for CSR, and Jim Reich, CTO and co-founder at Palatehome.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed