Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Blog

Accidental engineering: 10 mistakes turned into innovation

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
EREBUS0
User Rank
Author
re: Accidental engineering: 10 mistakes turned into innovation
EREBUS0   4/30/2013 9:43:22 PM
NO RATINGS
It's the old addage of "one persons bug is another persons feature." Ending up with something other than what you intended is considered scientific heresey. That is why creative people always assess what something can do rather than worry about what it did not do. Innovation is the art of seeing potential where none currently exist. Many fortunes have been made by inspiration and application of others failures. Before you declare anything a failure, you must first understand its full potential. After all, engineering is a test of your ability to make something from anything.

elPresidente
User Rank
Author
re: Accidental engineering: 10 mistakes turned into innovation
elPresidente   4/30/2013 6:14:49 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm getting tired of this editorial trend of mistakes being equated to innovation. It seems to be a coordinated coverup for the ineptitude occupying office and lab chairs while competent people are standing on street corners with tin cups. Mistakes cost money and are random, unpredictable events, usually caused by carelessness, ignorance, or ineptitude. Mistakes are to be avoided at all cost. Failure and innovation, on the other hand, are calculated risks. Only one of the 9 examples in the EDN article was a mistake. The rest were curious people looking into accidental occurrences. An accident is not a mistake - equating the two terms is.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Accidental engineering: 10 mistakes turned into innovation
old account Frank Eory   4/30/2013 5:04:16 AM
NO RATINGS
The adhesive accidentally developed at 3M and later used on post-it notes should've been included in this list.

More Blogs
If you can remember back to 1994, then take a shot at naming these test instruments.
Executives from Parrot, Qualcomm, small UAV lobby group and ex-FAA chief will join the drone debate at EE Times radio show, 9:00a.m., Pacific time, on Thursday, July 9th.
The right design framework and RTOS can help simplify and cost-reduce creation and certification of safety-critical software.
A new study comparing the Intel X86, the ARM and MIPS CPUs finds that microarchitecture is more important than instruction set architecture, RISC or CISC.
2015 is a wonderful year for anyone who has a special interest in time or simply experiences its passage.
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week