Breaking News
Blog

Did you say 'programmable analog'?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
EREBUS0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Did you say 'programmable analog'?
EREBUS0   5/29/2013 7:56:34 PM
NO RATINGS
As you say, there are Pro's and Con's to building an Analog chip with programmable functions. I could easily see a simple RF/Audio chip where the user could set up a number of OpAmp stages with filters, edge detectors, peak detectors and a number of other functions. Such a chip would let the "Analog Challenged" engineers with a way to quickly set up a signal conditioning chain for their sensors before turning everything over to the digital world. Same for audio or RF outputs. Sometimes you just need to tweek the final stage, but you do not need an exotic solution, just a serious of filters and buffers to improve the S/N before you blast the information into the ether. Plus such a chip would generate interest in more people learning some of the basic Analog circuits.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Did you say 'programmable analog'?
old account Frank Eory   5/30/2013 6:39:51 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think many engineers today would consider "programmable" to mean setting gain or frequency response via external passive components or jumpers. Programmable in today's world should exclusively mean "configurable via software." Indeed, a great many analog-mixed signal ICs that have any level of complexity beyond a couple op-amps in a package also have an I2C and internal configuration registers for adjusting functional & parametric characteristics.

August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.