Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Blog

Has Intel Really Beaten ARM?

Jim McGregor
7/10/2013 07:45 AM EDT

 43 comments   post a comment
Page 1 / 2 Next >
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 5 / 5
TaraAMD
User Rank
Rookie
Excellent article!
TaraAMD   7/10/2013 1:49:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Great post, Jim. Very interesting indeed.

MClayton0
User Rank
CEO
Re: What about power?
MClayton0   7/10/2013 1:49:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Scaling of the benchmark LEVELS is key here in my opinion.

What are the quantitative measures used to give qualitative performance "scores?"

For gaming people, only super fast will do at any power cost.

For most other people, battery life dominates in the high end phone market in my opinion, as long calls are common, hectic days on road, but a dead phone is very very costly, so multi-day battery life in heavy use scenario is very important. 

Other "performance" metrics are unclear to non-techies so perhaps someone can make them clearer in terms like "time to open email" or texting delays, whatever.

eewiz
User Rank
CEO
What about power?
eewiz   7/10/2013 1:24:37 PM
Does the "Relative performance" in the plot refer to computational performance/speed alone?

If so this analysis kinda sidestep the issue of power consumption. It was not the processor's computational speed that was in question. It was that Intel CPU had more or less the same performance at HALF the current drain/power.

 

 

<<   <   Page 5 / 5
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week