Breaking News
Blog

Prototyping Software: What Do You Do?

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re: Re-designing the wheel:
Max The Magnificent   7/23/2013 1:55:21 PM
NO RATINGS
@DU0...1: There is still a lot of headroom improving the sample algorithms. And that is exactly the point to differentiate...

Good point -- I'll give you that one :-)

DU00000001
User Rank
Author
Re: Re-designing the wheel:
DU00000001   7/23/2013 1:37:11 PM
NO RATINGS
There is still a lot of headroom improving the sample algorithms. And that is exactly the point to differentiate:

* improve performance
* improve robustness   or simply
* find the best tradeoff for a given task.

DrFPGA
User Rank
Author
Re: Re-designing the wheel:
DrFPGA   7/22/2013 2:58:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Max-

Yep, designing something new from scratch can be difficult, but that's where the big market differentiators come from! Motor control is a good example, in my mind, because new algorithms that start out being targeted at very expensive motors gradually get implemented in much less expensive motors by MCUs (and need to be prototyped somehow first!).

A very large percentage of electric power use is tied directly to motors so new algorithms that can improve power efficiency continue to find their way into new designs. Unfortunately, many  motor control algorithm 'shapes' are currently more 'square' than 'round'. We still need some work to get the right 'wheel'.

Take a look at my recent post on motor control algorithms for MCUs at MicroController Central (click here) to read about the evolution of algorithms over the years...

Max The Magnificent
User Rank
Author
Re-designing the wheel:
Max The Magnificent   7/22/2013 2:41:00 PM
NO RATINGS
@DrFPGA: Let's say we can get the example code via an evaluation kit. We could use this as the basis for our design, but then so could everyone else, which means it will be difficult for us to differentiate our design from the competition.

The problem is that things like motor control algorithms are now so fiendishly complex that creating something from scratch is like re-designing the wheel (it's difficult to improve on the basic "shape" :-)

 

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed