Breaking News
Blog

Mobile Benchmarks Are Inherently Limited

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
Re: What's the answer?
DMcCunney   7/24/2013 12:13:40 PM
NO RATINGS
A critical question would be whether the benchmark is really created to be useful for design engineers, or whether it is manipulated to give consortium members marekting ammo.

Both.  If you monitor any of the standards making efforts, you see lots of jockeying for position, and "We firmly support standards! Do it our way!" posturing. 

I'd expect less of the latter in this instance, simply because there would likely be fewer participants with an investment in an existing approach that they wish to preserve.

I think of the need as analogous to what a software engineer does when developing code.  They'll do profiling to determine where their code is spending its time to speed things up and reach performance targets.  (And the places that need optimizing often aren't where the developer might expect.)

I wonder what developers of stuff that could use this sort of benchmark use now?  I can see some engineer or the engineer's employer saying "This is how we do it." and propose it as a base for how others mighjt do it.

 

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What's the answer?
mcgrathdylan   7/24/2013 11:48:51 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your input as always DMcCunney. Obviously a key part of the challenge here is defining what is needed in a benchmark for use within the industry. But that still leaves unanswered the question of who will lead this effort, if anyone. A consortium would seem the most logical choice, but we know how the politics of consortiums can be. A critical question would be whether the benchmark is really created to be useful for design engineers, or whether it is manipulated to give consortium members marekting ammo.

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
Re: What's the answer?
DMcCunney   7/24/2013 11:05:40 AM
NO RATINGS
I would expect some sort of industry consortium, but that would require a perception by the industry that standard benchmarks are needed, with a standards effort to define what the benchmarks measure and how they do it as the first step.

So the question becomes what purposes the benchmarks will serve and who the projected audience will be.  I don't see such benchmarks as being intended for consumers (though they will almost certainly be used that way when they exist.)  If you are in the industry, what benchmarks will you need, and how will you use them?

Since the main addition I can see to such benchmarks is measuring platform efficiency of a particular design, if I'm an engineer, I want to see whether my design is hitting the platform efficiency targets I have, with data to indicate why I'm not and what changes I have to make to hit my targets if I'm not.

They're the sort of measurements I'd expect to apply in the prototype stage to help me reach what is wanted in what my employer wants to sell.

 

 

JimMcGregor
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What's the answer?
JimMcGregor   7/24/2013 2:27:37 AM
NO RATINGS
It will take broad industry participation to develop effective benchmarking standards that represent both current and future usage models and system configurations. The  question is who will lead this effort?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
What's the answer?
mcgrathdylan   7/23/2013 8:03:12 PM
NO RATINGS
So what's the solution? In the comments on the earlier articles, we saw very clearly that many people disregard benchmarks altogether. Is there any hope of overcoming these challenges and making benchmarking a meaningful and worthwhile activity? Or should we just disregard them?

More Blogs
Teardown.com will have full Apple iPhone6 teardown next week. Here's what to do until then.
Specialized languages have been developed to address the unique requirements of embedded developers, but none have found universal acceptance.
New vehicle applications will depend on high data rates that cannot possibly be supported by today's CAN, LIN, and FlexRay systems. The "eyes and ears" for self-driving systems, for example, will need a high-bandwidth Ethernet backbone.
4 AXYZ is in the additive manufacturing business. But instead of printing with plastic, the company has developed technology that would allow it to create the first 3D printing machine to manufacture solid wood products.
Proto Labs expects to announce its next winners Oct. 7.
Top Comments of the Week
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
August Cartoon Caption Winner!
"All the King's horses and all the KIng's men gave up on Humpty, so they handed the problem off to Engineering."
5 comments
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
David Patterson, known for his pioneering research that led to RAID, clusters and more, is part of a team at UC Berkeley that recently made its RISC-V processor architecture an open source hardware offering. We talk with Patterson and one of his colleagues behind the effort about the opportunities they see, what new kinds of designs they hope to enable and what it means for today’s commercial processor giants such as Intel, ARM and Imagination Technologies.
Flash Poll