Breaking News
Blog

No Kidding, 2G for E-Call

NO RATINGS
< Previous Page 2 / 2
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Missed opportunity
junko.yoshida   7/24/2013 8:31:21 AM
NO RATINGS
To me, using 2G for newly minted eCall box (to be rolled out in 2015) strikes as a huge missed opportunity. 

By investing in LTE, for example, like what GM is planning to do, there seems to be a variety of business opportunities for carmakers to mine. Am I wrong about that?

bobdvb
User Rank
Manager
Re: Security
bobdvb   7/24/2013 8:30:22 AM
NO RATINGS
An educational video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU8hg4FTm0g

3G isn't totally secure but 2G allows the base station to tell the phone to turn off the security mechanisms and 2G devices by default trust *any* base station.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Security
junko.yoshida   7/24/2013 8:17:52 AM
NO RATINGS
EU's eCall does not mandate which cellular connection the eCall box needs to use. 

So, it is a choice left to automakers.

Why is 2G less secure than 3G in eCall implementation? Could you please educate me on that? Thanks!

bobdvb
User Rank
Manager
Security
bobdvb   7/24/2013 3:20:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Not only is E-Call a massive waste of money, but if it is going to have 2G technology it won't be secure! It is now trivial to mess with 2G so I worry about the consequences.

<<   <   Page 4 / 4
Flash Poll
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Join our online Radio Show on Friday 11th July starting at 2:00pm Eastern, when EETimes editor of all things fun and interesting, Max Maxfield, and embedded systems expert, Jack Ganssle, will debate as to just what is, and is not, and embedded system.
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed
Top Comments of the Week